Firmware wishlist and priorities for Duet WiFi and Duet Ethernet
-
Duet 0.6 and 0.8.5 used BSH105 - 20V Vds and only 1A because of much higher internal resistance.
-
@dc42
If I were to use M589: Configure access point parameters would it connect to my all ready networks and if no network create it's own? Or dose this override all existing networks? -
@catalin_ro Yes, checked the schematics myself to see where I'd got it from and planning the interlock loop for the Duet 0.6 was it. Only changes on the Duet2 boards has been the addition of a resistor on revision 1.02 between the gate of the MOSFET and the processor.
-
7, 11, 6, 14, 15
-
@bendiesel said in Firmware wishlist and priorities for Duet WiFi and Duet Ethernet:
@dc42
If I were to use M589: Configure access point parameters would it connect to my all ready networks and if no network create it's own? Or dose this override all existing networks?No, currently you use M552 to choose whether to run as a client or an access point.
-
@dc42 said in Firmware wishlist and priorities for Duet WiFi and Duet Ethernet:
...I'll stat a new wishlist soon...The last numbered list of items is from October 2017?
-
@doctrucker said in Firmware wishlist and priorities for Duet WiFi and Duet Ethernet:
@dc42 said in Firmware wishlist and priorities for Duet WiFi and Duet Ethernet:
...I'll stat a new wishlist soon...The last numbered list of items is from October 2017?
Yes, I'll do a new list after firmware 2.0 is released.
-
@dc42 Completely understand that! Thanks. I'll have a look over that after having a better look at the most recent RC for 2.0 at work next week.
-
1
2
Add support for webcam, for time-lapse and live print monitoring (That's like half the point of a WiFi printer anyway, so I don't have to go down there to check if my printer has malfunctioned)
-- Note that I only have 1 and 2 before the camera because it would be a good idea to make it hard for hackers to get access to a camera within my house.
15
11 -
There is already support for a webcam, but it has to be an IP camera with a facility for returning a still jpeg image because browsers don't support RTSP. See https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/How_to_include_a_web_camera_image_in_Duet_Web_Control. There is no possibility of connecting a webcam directly to a Duet because the processor isn't powerful enough and the USB port is device-only.
-
10,12 would be my choice as hysteresis compensation makes definitly sense for cnc machines having a rather stiff construction
-
My wishlist:
Move axis till endstop or input reached. If not made by "X"mm then pause
Also be able to invert the endstop or input depending on desired condition -
end.g
An optional system file, run at end of each print, instead of adding end code in slicer. I would use it to lift the print head and move the table to a position for removing the printed part.
I think those moves are more of a system setting than a print move. There fore it would be nice to have it set in the printer instead of a slicer setting.
-
@fotomas said in Firmware wishlist and priorities for Duet WiFi and Duet Ethernet:
end.g
An optional system file, run at end of each print, instead of adding end code in slicer. I would use it to lift the print head and move the table to a position for removing the printed part.
I think those moves are more of a system setting than a print move. There fore it would be nice to have it set in the printer instead of a slicer setting.
In the end tab of the slicer i would add M98 Pend.g
-
@fotomas This already exists in the form of M0 and stop.g
; stop.g
; called when M0 (Stop) is run (e.g. when a print from SD card is cancelled)
; Also called by slicer end gcode by M0https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Macros#Section_Pause_stop_and_power_fail
https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/GCode#Section_M0_Stop_or_Unconditional_stop
In my stop.g file I do all the end of print things like moving the head away from the print, maxing the part fan, turning off the heaters, etc. Then i the slicer end gcode I just have M0. That way whichever slicer I'm using stog.g gets used and I only have to make changes in one place. I do the same with start.g which gets run before a print starts.
-
No. 2 5 14. I would like to keep the G32 auto bed level as a fast check on anything moving when removing a stuck print. I have a CoreXY and it can slip the 2 motors out of position.
-
7, 10, 12, 14, 18,
would be my my wish list. However didn't put 4, 8, 19, 20 on my list as a think that is already working:
4 -> assigning 2 motors to one axis, separating them for homing and re-assembling them again with M584
8 -> M906 ..... I30 for current reduction
19 -> M80/M81 to turn ATX off
20 -> someting like M106 P2 T45:65 H100:101:102 .....Regarding better CNC support (12) my specific priorities would be:
- Safe tool-offsets and WCS so that they are still in place after restarting (similar to bed compensation)
- Modify M584 for tool measurement as I already proposed (implemented in my personal branch)
- Extend G30 with an S-3 option to allow for WCS probing (implemented in my personal branch)
- Allow macros to ask for input like position, tool-number, WCS-number....
- More frequent update of the position in the PanelDue / Webinterface (something like 10 HZ update frequency)
- Support for conditions, loops and parameters in Gcode
- Support canned cycles like G73-G89 in the form that they can be defined in e.g. G73.g ... files like for homing, cancel, resuming....
-
Ability to assign end stops to axes (especially useful for machines with "more than the norm" number of axes). Or more precisely the ability to assign end stops other than the default assignments.
Talking to Tony some time back when I was trying to get CoreXYUVnn (where nn could be AW) working, I'm fairly sure this is on the road map but it doesn't appear in this thread so I thought I'd mention it here so it doesn't get overlooked.
-
I don't know if it would be possible, but I would like to have Fanuc compatible gcode when in CNC mode. That would enable to use the vast majorities of CAM softwares available since all of them have a Fanuc post processor.
-
I thought Fanuc machines were rotary CNC machines - am I wrong?