How to reduce ABS curling?
-
Why does everything look so overextruded around the perimeter (not just the edge, but closer to the inside)?
This may be a job selection problem or a customer expectation management problem as opposed to a material problem - how steep is the overhang?
Maybe try a different brand of filament...
-
I am no expert on printing ABS, but if it were PLA I would say is over-extruded and/or printed too hot. Have you tried a lower chamber temperature such as 45C ?
-
I also print exclusively ABS. Do you have a part cooling fan running for the overhangs? If I need to run the fan, it is always at its lowest speed and I go extra slow for bridges.
Judging from the image I would say you have an overextrusion problem, try printing at 95% extrusion multiplier.
Regarding ABS filament, I achieve excellent results with the ABS+ variant of ICE filaments
-
Thanks everyone for your help! I'll do some testing and get back with you.
Thanks again!
-
@mrehorstdmd I'm not exactly sure to be honest! I'm experimenting with my outline overlap and I think that might be part of the issue.
Unfortunately, this is a personal project, and it's only a 45 decree overhang, so I think my expectations are reasonable.
@mrehorstdmd @dc42 @whosrdaddy Thanks for the tip about extrusion! I don't know how I missed it, but I was terribly overextruding. Reducing that helped a bit, but it was still nowhere near good.
What ultimately helped the issue was increasing temperature. According to a series of temp towers, ABS seems to have the best overhangs at very high temps!?
I'm printing at 280C with 100% fan on an e3d v6. It seems really high, but I get very good overhangs and strong layer adhesion.
Any other thoughts? Thanks!
-
@jadonm said in How to reduce ABS curling?:
I'm printing at 280C with 100% fan on an e3d v6. It seems really high, but I get very good overhangs and strong layer adhesion.
What was the chamber temp?
I've heard of some industrial machines that blow heated air on the part to keep it warm enough to bond when printing very high temp materials, or even ABS/ASA when the part is very large.
I suppose if the chamber is hot enough the part cooling fan becomes a part warming fan?
-
@jadonm Try without fan, unless the air is really hot enough (ie 80+ °C)
-
Thanks for your input! Any more I can learn about the issue would be awesome!
@Phaedrux My chamber temp was set to 70C. Yes, I got my inspiration from Stratasys. Heated chambers are not common because of patents, but a few people on this forum (was it you, @mrehorstdmd) have a chamber heater and like it. It's true - ABS has almost no warpage in a 70C chamber.
My fans make the prints look better and don't cause warpage or sacrifice layer adhesion with the chamber heated.
@whosrdaddy I've already tried it, and it's only worse. This issue tends to be very frustrating!
-
I'm still getting this wavy artifact on that overhang. Any ideas? I wish there was some way I could help you guys in return! -
Still looks a bit over extruded to me.
What are your slicer print settings?
-
Is the perimeter line width greater than the nozzle diameter?
-
-
I see you have print direction set as outside in, for better overhangs try inside out, so that the outer wall has more to grab on to.
It also seems an odd choice to extrude at 0.3 width using a 0.4 nozzle.
And your wall print speed seems to be 75mm/s? That might be a bit too fast for such a small part.
-
@phaedrux It is set to inside out. On Windows the black one is the one checked.
What are the recommended extrusion widths? On my 4 Flashforge Creator Pros with a 0.4 nozzle I do quick prints with a 0.4mm extrusion width and get even better results with smaller widths. Maybe I should try increasing it!
Thanks for the tips! I'll also experiment with my speeds. Thanks for all your help!
-
Try printing a little slower and dropping your fan speed or shutting it off all together. I didn't see your temps. Too high a bed temp can hurt overhangs.
-
@antlestxp Sorry, I was going to include them but forgot. My extruder is 280C, bed is 110C, and chamber is 70C.
I know those sound way off, but see the previous posts. I've also experimented with the fan speeds above. Thanks for your help though!
-
Unless I'm reading it wrong, in the FFF settings, extruder tab it says you're trying to print 0.3mm wide lines with a 0.4 mm nozzle, and if that weren't bad enough, also using a 0.93 extrusion multiplier. That's not going to work.
If you try to print a too narrow line, it will tend to blob irregularly, and it will wander back and forth under the nozzle. The next layer will do the same and it will turn into a mess, and will make for a very weak print.
I'd never try to print a line width less than the nozzle diameter. In the bad old days, I let slic3r pick the line widths and it did that sort of thing. Once I figured out what was happening, I never let slic3r pick lines widths again. I don't know if they've fixed that or not in more recent releases.
-
@mrehorstdmd Thanks for your input!
I tried a 0.5 millimeter extrusion width but that didn't seem to cause any increase in quality. All it did was meet the part look coarser because the extrusions were wider.
My flashforge Creator pro has a 0.4 mm nozzle and I've noticed no adverse effects with a 0.3 millimeter extrusion width. Why is that?
Thanks for your help!
-
@jadonm I don't know why your other printer would work with those settings. It really shouldn't. Is it actually giving you 0.3mm wide lines? Picture the nozzle and the line of plastic it's laying down. How can a 0.4 mm diameter nozzle put down a 0.3 mm wide line with any precision? Is it going to lay down the line at the center of the nozzle- what would make it do that? Or off to one side or the other?
The print looks overextruded, yet it should be grossly underextruded based on your slicer settings. I think you need to run some basic extruder calibration. I'd set the line width to match the nozzle diameter for starters- minimize potential sources of error until it's working right.
-
Thanks all for your help! The wavy looking overhang happened to be the stl's problem. It was too low resolution, so the segments showed. The overhang seems to have exaggerated it.
Thanks again!
