Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation
-
I think both keyword-delimiting and indentation-delimiting should be permitted in the same file to allow for flexibility and varying degrees of clarity. I'm working on analyzing print data in Matlab to create feedback control, and I am quite fond of using both indentations and "end" statements at the same time. The indentations are not normally required in Matlab, but they're done automatically to help visualize the blocks.
-
@reghend79 said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
The indentations are not normally required in Matlab, but they're done automatically to help visualize the blocks.
That's a good point, END should still allow indentation for code clarity, though the indentation would have no semantic impact. E.g. these code snippet should have the same meaning
IF COMMAND1 COMMAND2 COMMAND3 END IF COMMAND1 COMMAND2 END IF COMMAND1 COMMAND2 END IF COMMAND1 COMMAND2 END
-
@zapta said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
One option is to annotate it with comments.
END ; while xyz
True but with specific keywords I'm forced to do the "right" thing.
Frederick
-
Here's one way to "DO" it.
https://www.cnccookbook.com/cnc-g-code-macro-conditions-looping/
-
@fcwilt said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
@garyd9 said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
Can you please give an example of a gcode sequence that would impractical with the current space delimiting blocks?
The issue is gcode files as generated by a slicer - not the files you would create yourself on the duet.
That doesn't answer the question. Without an example of the problem, it's difficult to give a reasonable opinion on a proposed solution.
-
I think removing all indentation/whitespace from the syntax is a good idea. I also think a single
END
keyword is best. Multiple end keywords is just unnecessary. Keep track of theEND
s the same way one keeps track of the}
s. -
@garyd9 said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
That doesn't answer the question. Without an example of the problem, it's difficult to give a reasonable opinion on a proposed solution.
As dc42 said in his opening post:
However, the need to indent the body of a conditional or loop makes it impractical to use a while-loop to create a looping GCode file, for example for a belt printer.
That seems clear enough.
Frederick
-
@garyd9 said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
@fcwilt said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
@garyd9 said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
Can you please give an example of a gcode sequence that would impractical with the current space delimiting blocks?
The issue is gcode files as generated by a slicer - not the files you would create yourself on the duet.
That doesn't answer the question. Without an example of the problem, it's difficult to give a reasonable opinion on a proposed solution.
Suppose you generate a GCode file using a slicer. But you have a belt printer and you want to print it 10 times, with a belt movement between each iteration.
Using existing slicers, there is no way to use the slicer start and end scripts to achieve this.
You could achieve it by editing the GCode file, but then you would have to indent almost the whole GCode file so that it became the body of the while-loop.
If we offer the option to delimit if- and while-commands explicitly, then you could insert one line near the start of the file (the 'while' line), and one near the end (the 'end' line). You might even be able to put the 'while' line in your slicer start script, and the 'end' line in the end script, so that you don't need to edit the file at all.
Does that make the reason for this proposal clearer?
-
@bot said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
Keep track of the
END
s the same way one keeps track of the}
s.'}' symbols are evil incarnate.
Frederick
-
@fcwilt
} // they don't seem so bad to me
-
@dc42 curly braces for me every time. I don't see the point of adding extra keywords that just take up space.
-
@fcwilt I once used a language called pl/9 that had a repeat...until. I miss it from every other language I've used since.
-
@tekkydave said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
@fcwilt I once used a language called pl/9 that had a repeat...until. I miss it from every other language I've used since.
I never heard of PL/9 - I used PL/1 for a bit - it's looping syntax was flexible and consistent.
My programming language of choice is Delphi.
Frederick
-
@tekkydave said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
@dc42 curly braces for me every time. I don't see the point of adding extra keywords that just take up space.
Keywords have a mnemonic value that isolated arbitrary symbols lack.
Frederick
-
@dc42 said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
Does that make the reason for this proposal clearer?
Yes, much clearer. Thank you.
I'm not familiar with belt printers and how this might be used - which left (and still leaves) my understanding lacking.
That being said, can the problem be addressed using macros? Can a print job's gcode use M28/M29 to create new files?
; ----- start gcode ; ; inital printer setup ; M28 job.gcode ; cause the actual gcode to be written to job.gcode ; ; ------- actual print gcode generated by slicer ; ; --------- end gcode M29 ; stop/save job.gcode ; ; -- here would be the loop for running the print job while (some_condition) ; belt movement M32 job.gcode
<eof>
(I have no idea if a gcode file can use M28/m29 to create another gcode file, but if it can...)
-
@dc42 said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
@garyd9 said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
@fcwilt said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
@garyd9 said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
Can you please give an example of a gcode sequence that would impractical with the current space delimiting blocks?
The issue is gcode files as generated by a slicer - not the files you would create yourself on the duet.
That doesn't answer the question. Without an example of the problem, it's difficult to give a reasonable opinion on a proposed solution.
Suppose you generate a GCode file using a slicer. But you have a belt printer and you want to print it 10 times, with a belt movement between each iteration.
Using existing slicers, there is no way to use the slicer start and end scripts to achieve this.
You could achieve it by editing the GCode file, but then you would have to indent almost the whole GCode file so that it became the body of the while-loop.
If we offer the option to delimit if- and while-commands explicitly, then you could insert one line near the start of the file (the 'while' line), and one near the end (the 'end' line). You might even be able to put the 'while' line in your slicer start script, and the 'end' line in the end script, so that you don't need to edit the file at all.
Does that make the reason for this proposal clearer?
That could be simplified down to a gcode command that executed a specific .gcode file multiple times:
Mxxx thisprintjob.gcode S10
For example.
That has the advantage of not needing anything like the complexity of conditionals.I think the fact that it is a programming loop is making people think that the solution is to create the ability in g-code to code loops. Where as in fact for the described use case at least, its not really a loop, its just a way to not have the file be 10 times longer than it needs to be.
At there other things that actually are conditional and not just 'do x, y number of times'?
(in fact, all this could be done in DWC... which in some ways makes more sense).
-
@fcwilt said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
'}' symbols are evil incarnate.
The Duet's firmware is full of them, don't bring it into your home.
https://github.com/Duet3D/RepRapFirmware/blob/dev/src/Movement/DriveMovement.cpp
-
end
is fine- I would pick just 1 way to do it, even if that way breaks existing code. Now is the time to make breaking changes. I don't want to imagine a) what tricky things users will think up to fool themselves b) what implementation bugs will arise due to the complexity of having 2 ways to do it.
- As a software engineer, this question makes my skin crawl. I really wouldn't do anything for whole files, just blocks. But if you really want to mix both styles, I would do this: require unintended blocks to have a
begin
andend
keywords, on their own lines, to delimit the block. That waybegin
/end
can be used with all of the existing block types without renaming them (the names are perfectly good as-is).
if foo == bar begin ; begin unruly slicer generated gcode G10 G1 X50 Y50 F5000 ; and so on ... end
This is basically a friendlier versions of parens
{<block>}
. You could also postfix theif
statement with python's:
to indicate an unintended block start but this is so subtle and easy to miss that I think it is visiting an evil on the intended audience.Visual Basic has "OrElse" and "AndAlso", because they refused to re-define the meaning of "or" and "and". Don't be Visual Basic.
-
@zapta said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
The Duet's firmware is full of them, don't bring it into your home.
That's why I perform a ritual "cleansing" of the boards before I use them in a printer.
Better safe than sorry.
Frederick
-
@theruttmeister said in Feedback wanted: conditional GCode without indentation:
That could be simplified down to a gcode command that executed a specific .gcode file multiple times:
Mxxx thisprintjob.gcode S10That would still require editing the slicer generated file to separate out the pre-print/post-print code from the main body of the code.
With a While and End you add two lines to the file and your done.
Frederick