HELP! Duet 2 WiFi Configuration and DWC Upload???
-
@pcnoobneedsmajorhelp said in HELP! Duet 2 WiFi Configuration and DWC Upload???:
and I was asking about the mesh bed
I hadn't seen that post yet. I was replying to the question about resetting the bltouch without rebooting.
-
I have them reversed because when my X and Y are homed, their "0" values are actually 229.5 and 231.1
-
Ah, got it.
-
@pcnoobneedsmajorhelp said in HELP! Duet 2 WiFi Configuration and DWC Upload???:
I have them reversed because when my X and Y are homed, their "0" values are actually 229.5 and 231.1
The firmware doesn't see if that way. It just wants the minimum extent and the maximum extent.
Please send M98 P"config.g" and see if it complain about it. Or just copy and paste your M557 line into the gcode console and see if it complains.
-
-
There you go. Flip your values for X and Y and try again.
-
It's still going but I keep getting these warnings
-
It seems to not be going all the way to the left and way too far to the right
-
-
Should I add (-) somewhere idk I'm just guessing
-
How did you measure the XY offset of the probe from the nozzle?
Keep that offset in mind when you set the M557 range. If you try and probe a point that it can't reach because of the offset it will give you that error.
You can also just use a full zero to max range for M557 and just let it skip the points it can't reach. Other than the warnings popping up it will still generate a heightmap for the area that it can reach.
-
After a couple hours of tuning I got this height map. Do you think its good enough, or should i keep adjusting the bed and do another height map?
This was done with my heaters on
And this was the one I did with the heaters off
Thanks,
-Carson
-
Those look pretty good actually. If you want to test the effectiveness of the mesh compensation try printing something like this
-
Ok. I can print that now, right? So, like no more setting up the mesh compensation, or saving it to the SD Card?
What is the Z=0 datum for? Is that just if I want to use a different height map?
Before I checked my points with the probe, I would home Z and then bring the bed down 6.5mm and command the probe. Is that the Z datum? Z at 0 or at 6.5?The only other thing on the Mesh Bed Compensation page is Compensation Taper. Do I need to mess with that at all, or no?
I found this a while back. Does it apply to me? or is it the same thing I'm doing currently?
https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Setting_up_automatic_probing_of_the_print_bed
Thanks,
-Carson
-
@pcnoobneedsmajorhelp said in HELP! Duet 2 WiFi Configuration and DWC Upload???:
Ok. I can print that now, right? So, like no more setting up the mesh compensation, or saving it to the SD Card?
Yes you should be ready to go. The mesh is saved to the SD card as soon as it's created with G29. It's stored as heightmap.csv in the system folder.
@pcnoobneedsmajorhelp said in HELP! Duet 2 WiFi Configuration and DWC Upload???:
What is the Z=0 datum for?
A datum is a fixed reference point. So in this context, all it means is the position where Z=0. In other words, it's where your bed surface is. The Z axis position displayed is the distance between the bed and the nozzle tip. This gets set by the probe when you home Z.
@pcnoobneedsmajorhelp said in HELP! Duet 2 WiFi Configuration and DWC Upload???:
Compensation Taper. Do I need to mess with that at all, or no?
That's up to you. It reduces the amount of compensation applied over a set amount of height. So in your case the bed is fairly flat and the deviations between low spots and high spots is pretty small. You could set a taper off value of 20mm so that by the time the print reaches 20mm it's not compensating anymore. Try it both ways when printing a simple tall tower and see what it does differently. You probably won't be able to tell.
@pcnoobneedsmajorhelp said in HELP! Duet 2 WiFi Configuration and DWC Upload???:
https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Setting_up_automatic_probing_of_the_print_bed
You're basically already doing that using G29.
-
So before I do my test print (since I installed the new motor) I wanted to recheck my E-steps, so I did, and It's all good. Then I rechecked my max feed rate, and it went from 5.98 to 1.45mm/s. Is that going to be enough speed? If not, is it kosher to increase the motor current past 80%, or would it burn out on a long print/fry anything? Right now my new motor's current is set to 1200mA
New Motor Specs
Old Motor test results
Thanks,
-Carson
-
If the new motor has much lower torque than the previous one that might explain it. Usually the shorter the motor the lower the torque.
Increasing the current past 80% is possible but heat becomes an issue and there are diminishing returns. Ultimately it won't help that much.
How did you measure the max flow rate?
-
Max Flow Rate = Max Input Feed rate * pi * (Filament Diameter/2)^2
Do you think 1.45 will be fine though? if not I'll get a new motor
-
That seems a bit low, but small pancake motors like that aren't really meant to be power houses. Small, light, compact for geared direct drive extruders. Shouldn't really be a problem if printing with a 0.4mm nozzle and 0.2mm layer height at 50mm/s. Anything more than that and you'd be possibly skipping steps.
How did you determine 1.45mm/s was the max feed rate you could reach? What kind of filament and what temp?
-
I used to print at 213 but then I added the all metal Hotend with a copper coated block. So now, I print at 218 and have been getting really good results (with PLA).
The process I used was very caveman haha. After lowering the bed to about 150mm, I set the feed amount starting at 10mm and I set the feed rate at 1mm/s. I increase the feed rate by .25mm increments until it starts to skip, then I back down in .05mm increments until the skipping stops, then to .01 increments. I then run whatever that speed is (in this case 1.45mm/s), at 30mm of feed amount, and if I get no skipping again, I'll bump it up to 100mm feed amount. If it can safely handle 100mm at that speed without skipping then that's my max feed rate.
The only other thing that comes to mind would be the gear ratio not sure if It's 3:1 or not