PT100 vs PT1000

A Former User

Only problem is that it mentions changing the "pull up" resistor on the mother board for best performance, and while I've got soldering gear and reasonable skills in that area I'm not so keen on doing that, especially without using air soldering gear.

Maestro and Duet 3 already have this change. (edit 2k2 instead of 4k7 iirc)

deckingman

@Corexy Personally, I wouldn't bother with PT100s again. You might get a more accurate temperature reading but that's debatable. But does it matter? We tend to set the hot end temperature to whatever works best for any particular filament, so does it ally matter if the displayed temperature is a couple of degrees different to the absolute value? My opinion is that you need to buy an additional daughter board which will give you a more accurate reading, which you'll largely ignore and simply set the hot end to whatever temperature works best. So personally, I'd spend the cost of the daughter board on something else.

A Former User

@deckingman said in PT100 vs PT1000:

so does it ally matter if the displayed temperature is a couple of degrees different to the absolute value

couldn't agree more, at least for my own hobbist use case.

on a larger scale it would make more sense to have both accuracy and precision in the temperature readings across multiple printers.

deckingman

@bearer said in PT100 vs PT1000:

@deckingman said in PT100 vs PT1000:

so does it ally matter if the displayed temperature is a couple of degrees different to the absolute value

couldn't agree more, at least for my own hobbist use case.

on a larger scale it would make more sense to have both accuracy and precision in the temperature readings across multiple printers.

In principle, yes. But even then it's debatable whether the typical variation between thermistors would be significant. For one thing, those multiple printers would need to have identical hot ends, and part cooling solutions. For another thing, the temperature sensor doesn't actually measure the temperature of the filament as it exits the nozzle. It just gives an indication of the temperature at a particular location on the hot block, some distance away from the nozzle tip and generally shielded from any part cooling air which might be blowing across, or deflected towards, that nozzle.

Corexy

OK,

So I'm using the Duet wifi, and I actually already have a daughter board here from years ago, brand new in the packet.

I just don't like the idea of soldering the 4 wires and having a joint in the line, or using a daughter board for that matter, but I'd really prefer a temp reading that was accurate.

Are there any real pros/cons either way, or is it 6 to one, half a dozen to the other?

dc42

PT100 gives higher resolution than PT1000 and (subject to the next point) greater accuracy. It's more affected by the resistance of the cable than PT1000, but you can avoid that by using a 4-wire connection.

A Former User

@Corexy said in PT100 vs PT1000:

So I'm using the Duet wifi,

i'd say its relatively easy to solder another resistance on top of the existing one to reduce the resulting parallell resistance. another 4k7 will get you close to the Maestro and Duet3, or a 1k3 value gets you close to the 1k referenced with respect to pt1000.

thats imo perfectly doable with tweezers and a soldering iron, no need for hot air.

dc42

The PT1000 works reasonably well on the Duet 2 using the standard 4K7 resistor. It's the older 8-bit boards with 10 bit ADCs (Duet 2 is 12 bit) that really need lower value resistors. However, my calculations indicate that 1K is too low, and 2K2 is about optimum.

Corexy

@dc42 said in PT100 vs PT1000:

The PT1000 works reasonably well on the Duet 2 using the standard 4K7 resistor. It's the older 8-bit boards with 10 bit ADCs (Duet 2 is 12 bit) that really need lower value resistors. However, my calculations indicate that 1K is too low, and 2K2 is about optimum.

It sounds like my OCD will only tolerate the PT100, as reasonably well is not going to be good enough for me unfortunately. And if I'm breaking out the soldering iron, I'd rather solder wires than mess with my motherboard.

So if my PT100 sensor is 2 wires, at what point do I convert it to 4 wires? Do I make the 4 wires as long as possible?

A Former User

@Corexy said in PT100 vs PT1000:

Do I make the 4 wires as long as possible?

yeah, as close to the sensor as possible.

Corexy

@bearer said in PT100 vs PT1000:

@Corexy said in PT100 vs PT1000:

Do I make the 4 wires as long as possible?

yeah, as close to the sensor as possible.

It's so strange that it makes a difference...

A Former User

some background https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-terminal_sensing

Corexy

@bearer said in PT100 vs PT1000:

some background https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-terminal_sensing

Copy that, thank you.

Is there a size/type of shielded 4 core cable that's most suitable? Last time I ran 4 separate pieces of wire, and I didn't have any problems, but I understand noise can be an issue and I'd like the wires all in a single cable this time if possible.

A Former User

i'd choose twisted pairs over shielded, but if you can have both go for it.

Corexy

@bearer said in PT100 vs PT1000:

i'd choose twisted pairs over shielded, but if you can have both go for it.

More likely I've got twisted pairs here already in my box of RC plane bits. Thank you

dc42

I use 4-core 7/0.2 unshielded cable.

Corexy

@dc42 said in PT100 vs PT1000:

I use 4-core 7/0.2 unshielded cable.

Cheers David.

Is that 7 strand you are referring to? Any idea of AWG?

dc42

7/0.2 means 7 strands each 0.2mm diameter. https://www.canford.co.uk/TechZone/Article/MetricAWGWireSizeEquivalents may be helpful.

Corexy

@dc42 said in PT100 vs PT1000:

7/0.2 means 7 strands each 0.2mm diameter. https://www.canford.co.uk/TechZone/Article/MetricAWGWireSizeEquivalents may be helpful.

So this might roll my PT100, heat break and cooling fan all into the one insulated cable? Twisted pairs too, so everyone's helpful advice has been heeded!

https://www.jaycar.com.au/cat-5-8-core-stranded-network-cable-sold-per-metre/p/WB2020

dc42

@Corexy said in PT100 vs PT1000:

@dc42 said in PT100 vs PT1000:

7/0.2 means 7 strands each 0.2mm diameter. https://www.canford.co.uk/TechZone/Article/MetricAWGWireSizeEquivalents may be helpful.

So this might roll my PT100, heat break and cooling fan all into the one insulated cable? Twisted pairs too, so everyone's helpful advice has been heeded!

https://www.jaycar.com.au/cat-5-8-core-stranded-network-cable-sold-per-metre/p/WB2020

I would not mix temperature sensor or endstop wires in the same cable as motors, fans or heaters.

My delta uses one 8-core 7/0.2 cable to connect the PT100 (4 wires) and the 4 wires that connect the built-in probe of the Smart Effector. It uses another 8-core 7/0.2 cable to connect the hot end heater and 2 fans. The hot end heater uses 2 wires in parallel to each end, to better handle the heater current.