PT100 vs PT1000
-
PT100 gives higher resolution than PT1000 and (subject to the next point) greater accuracy. It's more affected by the resistance of the cable than PT1000, but you can avoid that by using a 4-wire connection.
-
@Corexy said in PT100 vs PT1000:
So I'm using the Duet wifi,
i'd say its relatively easy to solder another resistance on top of the existing one to reduce the resulting parallell resistance. another 4k7 will get you close to the Maestro and Duet3, or a 1k3 value gets you close to the 1k referenced with respect to pt1000.
thats imo perfectly doable with tweezers and a soldering iron, no need for hot air.
-
The PT1000 works reasonably well on the Duet 2 using the standard 4K7 resistor. It's the older 8-bit boards with 10 bit ADCs (Duet 2 is 12 bit) that really need lower value resistors. However, my calculations indicate that 1K is too low, and 2K2 is about optimum.
Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com -
@dc42 said in PT100 vs PT1000:
The PT1000 works reasonably well on the Duet 2 using the standard 4K7 resistor. It's the older 8-bit boards with 10 bit ADCs (Duet 2 is 12 bit) that really need lower value resistors. However, my calculations indicate that 1K is too low, and 2K2 is about optimum.
It sounds like my OCD will only tolerate the PT100, as reasonably well is not going to be good enough for me unfortunately. And if I'm breaking out the soldering iron, I'd rather solder wires than mess with my motherboard.
So if my PT100 sensor is 2 wires, at what point do I convert it to 4 wires? Do I make the 4 wires as long as possible?
-
@Corexy said in PT100 vs PT1000:
Do I make the 4 wires as long as possible?
yeah, as close to the sensor as possible.
-
@bearer said in PT100 vs PT1000:
@Corexy said in PT100 vs PT1000:
Do I make the 4 wires as long as possible?
yeah, as close to the sensor as possible.
It's so strange that it makes a difference...
-
some background https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-terminal_sensing
-
@bearer said in PT100 vs PT1000:
some background https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-terminal_sensing
Copy that, thank you.
Is there a size/type of shielded 4 core cable that's most suitable? Last time I ran 4 separate pieces of wire, and I didn't have any problems, but I understand noise can be an issue and I'd like the wires all in a single cable this time if possible.
-
i'd choose twisted pairs over shielded, but if you can have both go for it.
-
@bearer said in PT100 vs PT1000:
i'd choose twisted pairs over shielded, but if you can have both go for it.
More likely I've got twisted pairs here already in my box of RC plane bits. Thank you
-
I use 4-core 7/0.2 unshielded cable.
Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com -
@dc42 said in PT100 vs PT1000:
I use 4-core 7/0.2 unshielded cable.
Cheers David.
Is that 7 strand you are referring to? Any idea of AWG?
-
7/0.2 means 7 strands each 0.2mm diameter. https://www.canford.co.uk/TechZone/Article/MetricAWGWireSizeEquivalents may be helpful.
Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com -
@dc42 said in PT100 vs PT1000:
7/0.2 means 7 strands each 0.2mm diameter. https://www.canford.co.uk/TechZone/Article/MetricAWGWireSizeEquivalents may be helpful.
So this might roll my PT100, heat break and cooling fan all into the one insulated cable? Twisted pairs too, so everyone's helpful advice has been heeded!
https://www.jaycar.com.au/cat-5-8-core-stranded-network-cable-sold-per-metre/p/WB2020
-
@Corexy said in PT100 vs PT1000:
@dc42 said in PT100 vs PT1000:
7/0.2 means 7 strands each 0.2mm diameter. https://www.canford.co.uk/TechZone/Article/MetricAWGWireSizeEquivalents may be helpful.
So this might roll my PT100, heat break and cooling fan all into the one insulated cable? Twisted pairs too, so everyone's helpful advice has been heeded!
https://www.jaycar.com.au/cat-5-8-core-stranded-network-cable-sold-per-metre/p/WB2020
I would not mix temperature sensor or endstop wires in the same cable as motors, fans or heaters.
My delta uses one 8-core 7/0.2 cable to connect the PT100 (4 wires) and the 4 wires that connect the built-in probe of the Smart Effector. It uses another 8-core 7/0.2 cable to connect the hot end heater and 2 fans. The hot end heater uses 2 wires in parallel to each end, to better handle the heater current.
Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com -
@dc42 said in PT100 vs PT1000:
@Corexy said in PT100 vs PT1000:
@dc42 said in PT100 vs PT1000:
7/0.2 means 7 strands each 0.2mm diameter. https://www.canford.co.uk/TechZone/Article/MetricAWGWireSizeEquivalents may be helpful.
So this might roll my PT100, heat break and cooling fan all into the one insulated cable? Twisted pairs too, so everyone's helpful advice has been heeded!
https://www.jaycar.com.au/cat-5-8-core-stranded-network-cable-sold-per-metre/p/WB2020
I would not mix temperature sensor or endstop wires in the same cable as motors, fans or heaters.
My delta uses one 8-core 7/0.2 cable to connect the PT100 (4 wires) and the 4 wires that connect the built-in probe of the Smart Effector. It uses another 8-core 7/0.2 cable to connect the hot end heater and 2 fans. The hot end heater uses 2 wires in parallel to each end, to better handle the heater current.
Nice one. Especially about the heater wires in parallel, that's a handy way to keep it all in the multicore cable.
It's another whole discussion, but I was considering using sensorless homing on the XY axis's, for the very reason of reducing the number of wires.
-
I mentioned it in my other post, but what's the advantage of an PT100/1000 over a thermistor?
I see slice use a thermistor in their Mosquito hot end. Is there any reason I'd go with a PT100/1000 in preference to that?
-
@Corexy said in PT100 vs PT1000:
I mentioned it in my other post, but what's the advantage of an RTD over a thermistor?
I see slice use a thermistor in their Mosquito hot end. Is there any reason I'd go with a PT100/1000 in preference to that?
TBH, I don't understand why Slice Engineering chose to use a high temperature thermistor rather than a PT 100 or 1000. It's inaccurate at ambient temperatures, not that it matters. Maybe they couldn't source a high temperature Prt in the USA? They do like to use locally made stuff, rather than imports.
-
Bugger it, I bought all of them. They cost bugger all from Triangle Labs, so I grabbed an assortment of PT100's, 1000's and other bits for the bits box. Was no point getting their standard thermistor cartridges, as they only rated to 280degC and if I'm buying the ludicrously expensive Mosquito/BMG combo, I at least want the option to heat it right up, even if I never do.
Plus a nice member here sent me a spare Slice thermistor he had laying around (cheers Deckers!!), so I'm now spoilt for choices when the time comes.
Now if only it all gets here before the bombs start dropping or the next exotic disease....
-
@Corexy The advantage of the Pt sensors over thermistors for wide temperature ranges is that the temperature coefficient is very well defined, and fully standardized across all the sensors. Thermistors have varying beta values, and when used over a wide temperature range can give significantly different results between two nominally identical units. In my day job, I work in a ver highly temperature-controlled lab with 0.01C regulation, and logging to 0.001C. This is a US Government standards lab. For this, we use calibrated thermistors because of their very high sensitivity. They are perfect for narrow-range applications. However, to cover a few hundred C or more, they are far from ideal. Although a Pt sensor is less sensitive (0.3%/C at room temp vs. typically 6%/C for a thermistor), they are very linear and interchangeable. A thermistor has too big a coefficient for wide ranges; a 100k thermistor at 25C is < 100 ohms at 280C. That's a huge dynamic range to cover. One the other hand, a Pt1000 is 1k at 0C and 2k at 273C. This is an easy range to digitize, and the resistance is high enough that modest-length wires don't affect the value too much.
The Pt100 sensors are well liked for heavy industrial and high precision applications because they are fairly robust, and the very low impedance makes them relatively noise resistant. On the other hand, the signal levels are low, and you must use a four-wire Kelvin connection unless the leads are very short, since the wiring resistance will be a big contribution to the total resistance. For high-precision work you can't even correct for the wiring resistance in a 2-wire connection, since you don't know the temperature of the wires.
