M308 and Current Loop Temperature Sensors

AJ Quick

Now that I have everything dialed in, I did in fact start getting errors on my console. I don't know if they were always there, or if I changed something and they just started showing up.

The problem is when assigning M308 P"spi.cs5" for each of the temperature sensors. I now get the error: "Pin 'spi.cs5' is not free".

Presumably because you can't assign sensors to use the same logical pin as others? I'll definitely be tracking this down and addressing it in the firmware if possible.

A Former User

@AJ-Quick said in M308 and Current Loop Temperature Sensors:

I now get the error: "spi.cs5" is not free.

~~not having read the whole thing, i think you need a chip select pin for each max31586 thermocouple chip?~~

AJ Quick

This post is deleted!

AJ Quick

I'm trying to work my way through this.

If I understand correctly:

CurrentLoopTemperatureSensor impliments SpiTemperatureSensor and that impliments SensorWithPort, which then assigns the pin inside of IoPorts.

IoPorts.cpp is preventing the port from being re-used. However if the pin type is set to "temporaryInput", we can assign it to more than one sensor. I think it would then be possible to add a special case where CurrentLoopTemperatureSensor can be classified as a temporaryInput (though all SPI temperature sensors should probably have the ability to re-use the chipselect pins).

AJ Quick

This may work.

Update SensorWithPort.cpp:

#include "CurrentLoopTemperatureSensor.h"

// Try to configure the port. Return true if the port is valid at the end, else return false and set the error message in 'reply'. Set 'seen' if we saw the P parameter.
bool SensorWithPort::ConfigurePort(GCodeBuffer& gb, const StringRef& reply, PinAccess access, bool& seen)
{
	if (gb.Seen('P'))
	{
		seen = true;
		if (ReducedStringEquals(GetSensorType(),CurrentLoopTemperatureSensor::TypeName))
		{
			return port.AssignPort(gb, reply, PinUsedBy::temporaryInput, access);
		}
		else
		{
			return port.AssignPort(gb, reply, PinUsedBy::sensor, access);
		}
	}
	if (port.IsValid())
	{
		return true;
	}
	reply.copy("Missing port name parameter");
	return false;
}

It compiled correctly, and I'll test it tomorrow.

dc42

The MCP3204 support was written to support just one channel. Therefore the firmware would have to be modified to support more than one concurrently. There is a mechanism in RRF 3.01 to allow a sensor to piggyback off another one, which is how the DHT humidity sensors are set up. We wrote it to be more general than was needed for DHT sensors, so it should be possible to adapt the MCP3204 code to support it.

AJ Quick

Back in October 2018 I wrote and expanded the CurrentLoopSensor code to accept a C (channel) parameter. The MCP3204 can accept 4 signals (or 2 differential) and the MCP3208 can accept 8 signals or 4 differential. It's in the code already.

I've done a little digging and did see the code for the parent and child sensors, but have not yet figured out how they would be implemented. Potentially that would be the best if they could be assigned that way instead of writing an exception to the SensorsWithPorts code. I'll look into it later, but I'll be testing my most recent change to see how if it works.

AJ Quick

I don't think the parent / child would be a bad idea. However, I am not sure exactly how it would be best to implement.

Perhaps if we had "current-loop" as one option and then "current-loop-child" as another?

Would it make sense to assign the channel through the "P" command?

My understanding is it could be assigned as follows:

M308 S0 P"spi.cs5" Y"current-loop" A"Channel 0" ; Current Loop Sensor by default on Channel 0.
M308 S1 P"S0.1" Y"current-loop-child" A"Channel 1" ; Current Loop Child on Channel 1
M308 S2 P"S0.7" Y"current-loop-child" A"Channel 7" ; Current Loop Child on Channel 7

OR

M308 S0 P"spi.cs5" Y"current-loop" A"Channel 7" C7 ; Current Loop Sensor on Channel 7.
M308 S1 P"S0.1" Y"current-loop-child" A"Channel 5" C5 ; Current Loop Child on Channel 5
M308 S2 P"S0.2" Y"current-loop-child" A"Channel 6" C6 ; Current Loop Child on Channel 6

I think the second example is better as not everyone is going to automatically be using Channel 0. Perhaps this can be done without needing to call it 'current-loop-child' but instead just checking if the pin is already in use by a current loop sensor? If it is in use, then apply the 'AdditionalOutputSensor'?

AJ Quick

Unsurprisingly, my possible fix (M308 and Current Loop Temperature Sensors) did not work.

I did not understand how the port was being assigned correctly.

I'll look more into this parent / child relationship and see what I can accomplish.

dc42

@AJ-Quick said in M308 and Current Loop Temperature Sensors:

I don't think the parent / child would be a bad idea. However, I am not sure exactly how it would be best to implement.

Perhaps if we had "current-loop" as one option and then "current-loop-child" as another?

Would it make sense to assign the channel through the "P" command?

My understanding is it could be assigned as follows:
M308 S0 P"spi.cs5" Y"current-loop" A"Channel 0" ; Current Loop Sensor by default on Channel 0.
M308 S1 P"S0.1" Y"current-loop-child" A"Channel 1" ; Current Loop Child on Channel 1
M308 S2 P"S0.7" Y"current-loop-child" A"Channel 7" ; Current Loop Child on Channel 7
OR
M308 S0 P"spi.cs5" Y"current-loop" A"Channel 7" C7 ; Current Loop Sensor on Channel 7.
M308 S1 P"S0.1" Y"current-loop-child" A"Channel 5" C5 ; Current Loop Child on Channel 5
M308 S2 P"S0.2" Y"current-loop-child" A"Channel 6" C6 ; Current Loop Child on Channel 6
I think the second example is better as not everyone is going to automatically be using Channel 0. Perhaps this can be done without needing to call it 'current-loop-child' but instead just checking if the pin is already in use by a current loop sensor? If it is in use, then apply the 'AdditionalOutputSensor'?

The first option would fit better with the architecture and I think it would be easier to implement.

AJ Quick

@dc42 said in M308 and Current Loop Temperature Sensors:

The first option would fit better with the architecture and I think it would be easier to implement.

Do you believe it could be done without calling it 'current-loop-child' (or a variant)? Or would something need to be made to differentiate it from a regular current-loop sensor?

dc42

@AJ-Quick said in M308 and Current Loop Temperature Sensors:

Do you believe it could be done without calling it 'current-loop-child' (or a variant)? Or would something need to be made to differentiate it from a regular current-loop sensor?

Yes, it needs a different sensor type name from the sensor that it piggybacks on to, because the name identifies which driver class it uses. Could be current-loop-additional or current-loop-extra or something like that. I suggest you keep "current-loop" in the name to make it clear which master sensor type it needs.

AJ Quick

I made the following changes:

https://github.com/dc42/RepRapFirmware/pull/380

I can't imagine it is that easy though. This does add 'current-loop-extra' which then (hopefully) directs to AdditionalOutputSensor. I am assuming all parameters that are passed, won't be passed to the parent though?

So if the "C" parameter is working now, it should work to set the different "C" parameter on the child? It won't force the channel to be adopted by the parent?

This possibly works like this now:

M308 S0 P"spi.cs5" Y"current-loop" A"Channel 7" C7 ; Current Loop Sensor on Channel 7.
M308 S1 P"S0.1" Y"current-loop-extra" A"Channel 5" C5 ; Current Loop Child on Channel 5
M308 S2 P"S0.2" Y"current-loop-extra" A"Channel 6" C6 ; Current Loop Child on Channel 6

Up to 7 children can be defined.

In order for the P parameter to carry the channel data, the existing code would need to be changed.

ajquick opened this pull request in dc42/RepRapFirmware

draft CurrentLoopSensors can now have children sensors. #380

dc42

Do you need the C parameter at all? I would have thought that the master current loop sensor would use channel 0, then child 1 (M308 S2 P"S0.1") would use channel 1, and so on.

AJ Quick

@dc42 Yes.

While channel 0 is the default, you can't assume all end users will have their main temperature probe set on channel 0. My main temperature reading is on channel 2 for example.

To force the channel to be designated by the P parameter, you lose backwards compatibility and need to change more of the default CurrentLoop code. Since you need to specify L and H settings anyways, it makes sense to just continue to use the C (and D) parameters for the child as well.

AJ Quick

Current status:

Current-Loop-Extra currently works by assigning a child of the parent sensor. Unfortunately the child is an exact clone of the parent. No channel, differential or low and high parameters are passed.

This might just be a problem with "AdditionalOutputSensor.cpp" though. It probably only passes the "Y" parameter currently.

C/D/L/H cannot be assumed to be the same for the parent and the child. For example my thermocouples have different L/H ranges.

AJ Quick

At a total loss here.

I am now understanding how the DHT sensor works, and it is not the same as how the MCP3204/8 works. DHT seems to always have the humidity value present, so it is a simple matter to just ask what that value is.

MCP3204/8 needs to treat each sensor as their own and communicate with the chip for each and every one. It also isn't something you can just change the channel and grab, since each sensor has its settings. I tried to allow AdditionalOutputSensor to configure the child sensor, but it just overrides the parent.

I suppose it would be possible to fully expand the CurrentLoopExtraSensor class to basically be a copy of CurrentLoopSensor, but that's not clean. There would be lots of code re-use.

The best thing I think that can be done is just to allow the SPI chipselect to be used by multiple sensors as long as the sensor is of the same type. At this time, I do not know how to accomplish that. I believe it should be safe to re-use chipselect pins, because they will automatically be queued and wouldn't be talking over each other. The worst case scenario is someone puts in the wrong chipselect and it cannot connect.

AJ Quick

This is what I've come up with:

https://github.com/dc42/RepRapFirmware/pull/380/commits/2ca324d3fd53f2988b4e2d95e878a2347b4065ee

Basically, add a new pin type of "chipSelect".

If it is of type chipSelect, it can be shared. When an SPI sensor makes a port, it assigns as type chipSelect. Now only other sensors can use that port for chip-select if it was previously used for chip-select. It should throw an error if any other code tries to use it for something other than chip-select.

This should allow CurrentLoopSensor to work while sharing the same chip-select and potentially can be used for other chips down the line.

ajquick opened this pull request in dc42/RepRapFirmware

draft CurrentLoopSensors can now have children sensors. #380

AJ Quick

Testing now. Those changes work, however any sensor that comes after the first are not reading the correct information.

M308 S0: Sensor 0 (Chamber) type Current Loop using pin (spi.cs5,duex.cs5,exp.50), reading 41.7, last error: success, channel: 2, temperature range 0.0 to 100.0C.
M308 S1: Sensor 1 (Model) type Current Loop using pin (spi.cs5,duex.cs5,exp.50), reading 201.6, last error: success, channel: 0, temperature range 109.5 to 330.0C
M308 S2: Sensor 2 (Support) type Current Loop using pin (spi.cs5,duex.cs5,exp.50), reading 201.4, last error: success, channel: 1, temperature range 109.5 to 330.0C

If I disable all except the Model for example. The temperature changes to the correct reading:

M308 S1: Sensor 1 (Model) type Current Loop using pin (spi.cs5,duex.cs5,exp.50), reading 109.5, last error: success, channel: 0, temperature range 109.5 to 330.0C

Seems the first sensor defined is always reading the correct number, but the 2nd or 3rd is always reading the wrong number. I suppose the SPI isn't actually queuing reads correctly? Further testing is needed.

dc42

@AJ-Quick said in M308 and Current Loop Temperature Sensors:

I suppose the SPI isn't actually queuing reads correctly?

I can't remember how the MCP3204 works, however with many SPI devices the data you read during a transaction is from the register whose address you set in the previous transaction.

It would probably be better to have the master device read the ADC results for all channels (which can probably be done in a single transaction - check the datasheet) and store them; then each child device can ask the master for the reading from its own channel. If you want the child devices to have different ranges, then either the child device will need its own configuration parameters, or the master configuration parameters changed to allow different ones to be specified for each channel (for example, by accepting arrays for the H and L parameters).