Backlash compensation
-
@dc42 .., I am also interested in backlash compensation. I was unaware, my fault overlooked when our company purchased the boards that it was unavailable or to be honest I would’ve had to go a different route. If any plans, or not yet, please let me know so we can decide how to proceed with these control boards. I believe that the majority of printer consumers probably use their printer more so as a weekend hobby so they haven’t seen the difference in print quality to desire backlash compensation as a priority and are happy with prints just being a usable part or printable idea. I’m sure only a small percentage actually want to use these controls in a commercial assembled platform that prints with precision or may not have equipment that benefits from a more precise control. Perhaps those unknowing would share a different perception if they knew it was available and made BL adjustments to their printers. Please keep us posted and Thank you.
-
It's very hard if not impossible to implement backlash compensation in a way that doesn't have unpleasant side effects. Some people tried to implement it in Marlin but it has never been accepted into the main branch. See https://github.com/MarlinFirmware/Marlin/issues/3664#issuecomment-344638870 for an example of the problems. Amongst the issues are:
-
When reversing direction in a print, if you don't take up the backlash very quickly enough then the head will be stationary for a short while, leading to over-extrusion at that point. But if you take it up too quickly then the motors will be noisy and you risk skipped steps.
-
Backlash compensation ruins the acceleration profile, making it more likely to excite resonances.
In some simple cases such as printing a square parallel to the X and Y axes on a Cartesian machine, backlash compensation could be done in a way that doesn't cause problems, because the slack in the X axis could be taken up gradually while printing parallel to the Y axis, and vice versa. But if you rotate the square by 45 degrees, the slack needs to be taken up instantly.
What steps/mm does your machine have, and how much backlash is there? Where the compensation required is no more than about 1 full step, it may be more practical to do because the risk of skipped steps should be small.
closed Hysteresis #3664
Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com -
-
@dc42 said in Backlash compensation:
- When reversing direction in a print, if you don't take up the backlash very quickly enough then the head will be stationary for a short while, leading to over-extrusion at that point. But if you take it up too quickly then the motors will be noisy and you risk skipped steps.
- Backlash compensation ruins the acceleration profile, making it more likely to excite resonances.
It's rather obvious you can't have best of all worlds, so not sure about all those points.
That said, I do understand it's very nontrivial given the feature set Duet already has, but I've been waiting for backlash compensation for a while now too. The axes are the least of my problem, even though it could benefit my printer. The real thing for me is my bowden extruder. The tubing has some backlash due to being quite long and the fact that on high speeds the pressure is so high that the tube connections give by about 1-2mm. I've already tried everything I could read or think of and it just seems there's another variable missing. I've used the Repetier backlash compensation before and it was working like a charm.
Not only X, Y, Z but Feeder motors should also be able to deal with backlash
As for risk of skipped steps - a calibrated machine doesn't skip.
-
@edgars-batna said in Backlash compensation:
The axes are the least of my problem, even though it could benefit my printer. The real thing for me is my bowden extruder. The tubing has some backlash due to being quite long and the fact that on high speeds the pressure is so high that the tube connections give by about 1-2mm. I've already tried everything I could read or think of and it just seems there's another variable missing. I've used the Repetier backlash compensation before and it was working like a charm.
This is exactly what pressure advance is for.
-
@dc42 said in Backlash compensation:
- When reversing direction in a print, if you don't take up the backlash very quickly enough then the head will be stationary for a short while, leading to over-extrusion at that point. But if you take it up too quickly then the motors will be noisy and you risk skipped steps.
Isn't the whole point of backlash compensation to reduce the mechanical dwell at a turning point? It's already sitting still in a mechanical dwell and overextruding, waiting for the axis slack to get taken up at a slow speed... Right? So, anything is better than nothing. In theory, anyway.
Sometimes it's all about those microns that nobody else cares about that sets you apart, or makes your job easier.
-
@mrehorstdmd said in Backlash compensation:
If there were a way to set up a table of corrections (maybe another config file with a list error values) for one cycle of the worm gear
How will the duet know the current rotation angle of the gear? That is, how will you home the angle?
-
@zapta It won't, and the stuff I was prattling about was error correction, not backlash compensation. In a belt lifted Z axis (or screw lifted, for that matter) there should be no backlash, but there can be repeatable error introduced by gears used to prevent bed-drop on power off. I brought it up because someone else mentioned it in relation to Z axes.
-
@mrehorstdmd, yes, I understand that, a consistent error that is a function of some gear angle. My question is, how the duet will know at what is the current angle of the gear to know at what amount to compensate? Will you have some mechanism to home the angle accurately enough such that duet can track it?
-
@Edgars-Batna said in Backlash compensation:
The real thing for me is my bowden extruder. The tubing has some backlash due to being quite long and the fact that on high speeds the pressure is so high that the tube connections give by about 1-2mm. I've already tried everything I could read or think of and it just seems there's another variable missing. I've used the Repetier backlash compensation before and it was working like a charm.
Isn't this the job of the Pressure Advance feature? Do you say that there is a way to compensate for bowdens even better? If so, it may be a very important feature.
(I gave on bowden and switch to a direct extruder. Couldn't get good enough results with a 600mm bowden tube).
-
@zapta said in Backlash compensation:
@mrehorstdmd, yes, I understand that, a consistent error that is a function of some gear angle. My question is, how the duet will know at what is the current angle of the gear to know at what amount to compensate? Will you have some mechanism to home the angle accurately enough such that duet can track it?
It won't know. That's the problem with trying to do that type of error correction. An optical endstop should be precise enough but there's a lot more to it than that. You have to somehow align the error correction with the error.
-
@zapta said in Backlash compensation:
@Edgars-Batna said in Backlash compensation:
The real thing for me is my bowden extruder. The tubing has some backlash due to being quite long and the fact that on high speeds the pressure is so high that the tube connections give by about 1-2mm. I've already tried everything I could read or think of and it just seems there's another variable missing. I've used the Repetier backlash compensation before and it was working like a charm.
Isn't this the job of the Pressure Advance feature? Do you say that there is a way to compensate for bowdens even better? If so, it may be a very important feature.
(I gave on bowden and switch to a direct extruder. Couldn't get good enough results with a 600mm bowden tube).
The Bowden connectors give in after a few longer prints and there is permanent 1-2mm play. Yes, that's where backlash compensation has to be and it has nothing to do with pressure advance. Sure, I can dial in PA to account for backlash, but then there's stringing and inconsistent segments, because PA does not pull or push the filament fast enough but just gradually.
I'm tired of constantly proving my point, to be honest. Not directed at anyone specific, it's just overall experience. There's many firmwares around and they already included many features that ARE WORKING. It doesn't matter if we can or can't move the extruder instantaneously, we can at least try to implement it in a way that it works and experiment from there. Here goes my ranting again. I might try implementing it one day, but for now it's enough frustration.
Just go direct, forget the Bowden, as it's harder to control.
-
Backlash compensator post-processor
I appreciate this is an old topic, but that backlash on direction change was my issue no matter how much I fine tuned my 1000mmx1000mm WorkBee OX running on Duet3D RepRap, and I couldn't find an acceptable software solution. I also had a couple of issues with post-processor that were available for RepRap CNC, so I made (and will continue to improve) this Fusion 360 Ultimate Post-Processor for RepRap!
Get it here from GitHub: https://github.com/BruceRoyce/UltimateRepRapPost/blob/main/UltimateRRPost.cpsWhen posting check "Apply Backlash Compensation" on the side panel, under Linear Backlash Compensation options and input 2 measured backlash on each axis (the offset for 1mm motion on direction change and for 10mm motion on each axis. Input 0 if none, see image below) and let it take care of backlashes by adjusting movements.
This in no way is a replacement for adjusting your config.g parameters and/or tuning the hardware to the best of your capability. It's only a final resort to overcome backlash.It also takes care of manual tool change, corner or Z-probing, beeps when operator attention is required, fixes WCS issues and more.
Important note: I made this for my own use, so please exercise caution! Obviously I won't be responsible for anything related to the use of this post-processor! Use own your own risk
