Best posts made by kb58

Too late to tell me to buy one - I enjoy learning new things and that included building a printer from scratch. It's a pretty decent learning curve, but having built two cars from scratch, I'm used to doing things the hard way - much more rewarding.

You can try washing the board in distilled water, then putting it in a warm area to dry. That said, were any changes made to the printer before the failure? It's highly unlikely that Dimafix is causing the problem, but try the above.

A few more possibilities:

• Is the printer in a heated chamber? Even if it's not, maybe the bed warmed the Delrin enough to expand it away from bearings?
• How much of a press fit were the bearings?
• does Delrin "cold flow" like Nylon, causing them to loosen?
• How do you know that the shafts are truly 90-deg to the belt path?
• How lose/tight are the bearing hubs on the bolt?
• Do the bearings spin freely, or could they be binding?
• Related, maybe the bearings bind as they warm up?

@jens55 Sometimes that works and sometimes it doesn't. If the oozed bit breaks off clean onto the bed, no problem. It can be more of a problem if it rolls around and sticks itself to the side of the nozzle cone. Afterwards, during the print, there can be a lump of melted filament right near the nozzle, risking dragging it through the wet extrusion.

I increased retract slightly and watched it. Somewhat surprisingly it made no difference. The nozzle comes to the front of the bed, extrudes XXmm, extruder stops, retracts, and that hanging bit is removed. At that point, it's "Press OK to Start", but then when I look back, there's already maybe 5mm hanging from the nozzle. Wipe that off, go to press OK, look at nozzle, and there's another 4mm. So, I just waited and watched, and over the next minute or so, maybe 50mm of extruded plastic had slowly wormed its way out of the nozzle.
As an experiment, I'll increase retract to something huge, like 5mm, to guarantee that the filament really isn't pushing at all. While I doubt that gravity is enough to allow the molten filament to pass through the nozzle, we'll see. It is a direct drive BondTech LGX, so there should be no Bowden tube antics going on.

@jens55 I had a few printers on my short list, but after digging deeper, there was a number of comments that "After I replaced the hotend, extruder, Bowden tube, fans, display, and controller, my Brand X is awesome!" My reasoning then switched to "well if a printer only becomes 'awesome' after replacing everything, then I'll make one from scratch." And yes, it can get pretty expensive...

@donstauffer said in Variable "already exists":

@fcwilt The files are there, including config.g, which shows zero bytes!

Interesting... I had this exact thing happen several weeks ago and am pretty sure it was due to a corrupted write. I had to delete config.g and renamed config.bak as config.g. The other way was to remove the SD drive and fix it in the PC - I always keep duplicates of the SD files on the PC for just this sort of reason.

Did you enable usage (whether it's present or not) of a PanelDue? If so, the firmware assumes that it's connected to io0.

If you want more detailed answers, please provide your config.g file, pasted in using the </> tag above the Reply window.

One thing I never see suggested is that if a user suspects that the bed profile is not being applied to a print, is to try this:

1. Tape something like a strip of thick construction paper across the bed.
2. Do a bed profile
3. View the bed profile, and it should clearly show the "lump" in the bed.
4. Remove the paper
5. Do a fake print (no filament) that crosses that area and watch the Z clearance. When it gets to where the paper was, you should see the nozzle move away from the bed as it approaches.

I'll look into using G1 H1. Keep in mind that I gathered the information on creating these files from multiple sources. Some of it hasn't been tested yet and is no doubt completely wrong, but for the purposes of this thread, I'll stick to just Z homing.

What you're describing is my end goal, to have the three steppers home to the switches, then do a three point probe to do fine leveling. As mentioned, I very likely have lines of code that are either wrong or have no business being there, but I'm slowly coming up on the learning curve for all of this.

An easy test is to unplug everything except power, power up the board, and see if the 3.3V rail drops again. If it stays good, start plugging in things one at a time (except steppers) until you find the troublemaker. If it remains bad, then yes, it's something on the board itself.

@fcwilt Yeah my opinion of it is... unclear. Several test pieces were made and since it's a direct drive setup, the range was kept between (0 - 0.06 or so). There was so little difference it was left at 0.04, but honestly, I could probably not see a difference between a part with zero and another with 0.04. Hoping that this is a good thing?

@fcwilt yup, bytes, all entered by hand, no assembler. I tried working with some of the Intel processors but just connected better with Motorola processors, 6800, 6802, 6809, and the 68HC11. That was, oh, 50 years ago... good times.

Someone will soon ask to see your config.g. Please post it using the </> tag in the reply window.

@deckingman said in Question about first test with Pressure Advance:

...I devised such a test several years ago, wrote it up on my blog and have been banging on about it for years but nobody takes any notice... Printing a cylinder which will be made up of multiple short segmented moves is probably the worse test method one could devise for evaluating pressure advance (IMO).

I went to your site and was surprised that the test object file isn't being offered up. How about posting up the test object G file and help others out instead of saying that their test objects are poor.

@kb58 Fixed!!!!!!!

Deleted config.g and renamed the backup to .g, and it's all working again. Wonder how that happened, but regardless, a huge thank you, phaedrux!

@nightlonk42 Those colors match how I have mine wired at the toolboard end, but at the stepper end, manufacturers can be a bit arbitrary. Honestly, just try a few permutations, as it'll take much less time doing that than waiting around for answers that may not be appropriate for your stepper.

Also, double check how you configured the stepper - having that wrong could do it as well. Someone's bound to ask for you to list out your config.g...

Search the forum for "pressure advance."

@phaedrux Thanks, yes, it took a while for it to sink in, as I kept interchanging the concepts of the the physical orientation of the axis with "up" equaling a greater value. It took a while to understand that an increasing Z is an absolute value in terms of distance, not with a directional polarity.

@nightlonk42 Here's how it's wired at the stepper end. Note that this is as viewed from the front of the extruder, and also that the stepper has been rotated so that its connector is on the bottom.

@phaedrux Sorry, yes. The laptop normally connects to a WIFI hub for Internet access, and sometimes when I first connect to the Duet3 6HC via a physical Ethernet cable, it doesn't see it. I haven't found what the magic handshake is to avoid it, i.e. closing IE before plugging in the Ethernet cable, or something like that.

I think most of you guys are way, way, further down the Duet road than I am, but I find it helpful to see new people (like myself) posting things as they discover them, as it helps those that come after. For this particular situation, I can see how it would be very easy to blame the Duet, since the WIFI Internet connection keeps working, but the hardwired Duet connection times out, but the problem does seem to be at the laptop end. Maybe it's fixed in Windows 10... or 11.