Firmware wishlist and priorities for Duet WiFi and Duet Ethernet
-
@dc42: great! I'm still not sure how I ended up hitting this limit, but my typical nginx config adds at least 4 additional headers. Chrome (or probably any other browser) adds 9 (when POST-upload). HTTP-Basic-Auth is one more header.
So we are pretty close to the current limit.If there is enough RAM / resources available, I would recommend bumping [c]MaxHeaders[/c] to maybe at least 24 or 32.
(not sure what happens if somebody sends a really large cookie…?) -
I've increased it to 30 for the Duet WiFi/Ethernet in the next beta. The other limit is that a complete HTTP request (excluding any postdata) must fit in 1460 bytes. A really large cookie could cause this limit to be exceeded, however DWC hasn't used cookies for a long time.
-
Using StallGuard to detect possible print collisions and layer shifts is probably the coolest feature in Prusa's new i3. I realize it's much easier for them since Prusa Research controls which motors they have, but an option to configure that would be really nice.
Seconded. I have read the other thread, and realize that there may be limitations, but the concept is sure interesting.
-
MQTT - so the printer can send out it’s status to MQTT compatible services, not so it can be controlled. Basically the printer reports as an mqtt sensor.
Personally I would use it to send me a text message via IFTTT , or flash my living room lights when a print has stopped/finished. Though other things like show hot end temperature via the colour of. A Philips hue lightbulb would also be possible.
Reference designs based on LWIP stack are available. I reckon %complete, finished state and temperatures would be the info to broadcast.
-
10. Axis hysteresis compensation. Backlash compensation
Please please please do this… without it 3d printing will never be that good without every expensive hardware..I have a number of printers of different kinematics but ALL suffer from backlash ... Seeming the only way to get rid of 99% of it is to go with ball screws on the X/Y access but that will massively increase cost, weight and inertia leading to a slow print..
Also it seems like Marlin is finally implementing this... so..
Thanks in advance
-
10. Axis hysteresis compensation. Backlash compensation
Please please please do this… without it 3d printing will never be that good without every expensive hardware..I have a number of printers of different kinematics but ALL suffer from backlash ... Seeming the only way to get rid of 99% of it is to go with ball screws on the X/Y access but that will massively increase cost, weight and inertia leading to a slow print..
Also it seems like Marlin is finally implementing this... so..
Thanks in advance
That's an unusual observation and request. Have you got any pictures or other evidence of how this backlash \ axis hysteresis manifests itself on all your printers? From a basic engineering point of view, backlash is a known phenomenon with screw driven systems and gear trains but not with belted systems, so I'm curious as to why you think that going from a (presumably) belt driven system to a screw driven system would eliminate 99% of the backlash.
-
My votes in order of priority, though may be too late:
4. Independent homing switches for multiple Z motors.
18. Ability to update PanelDue firmware via the web interface.
7. Dynamically-varying microstepping. This will allow you to configure 256x microstepping most cases, because the microstepping will be reduced automatically during high-speed moves.
10. Axis hysteresis compensation.
8. Standstill current reduction, which will allow higher motor currents to be used when the motors are moving.
-
My Vote, though probably too late:
10. Axis hysteresis compensation.
7. Dynamically-varying microstepping.
I am sure Ian knows this but … in order to make the firmware more CNC friendly i would suggest 3 additional things.
G2/G3 circular movement support
Pitch error comp on the axis (for lead screw/ball screw support)
Change M0/M1 to follow CNC convention with stop and option stop that doesn't necessarily cancel the job or turn the heaters off. Just performs a "feed hold"My 2 cents
-
G2 and G3 are already supported.
Please explain what exactly you mean by "Pitch error comp".
What exactly is the behaviour you would like to see for M0 and M1?
-
My vote for:
7. Dynamically-varying microstepping
Probe the bed multiple times at each point and take an average
-
G2 and G3 are already supported.
Please explain what exactly you mean by "Pitch error comp".
What exactly is the behaviour you would like to see for M0 and M1?
My bad on the G2/G3. I guess I never gave it a shot…
Pitch error comp is built into almost every CNC machine tool. It allows a user to deal with manufacturing defects in the lead screw and ball screws on a machine. Most machines allow a user to "adjust" where a specific point is in the axis. So a table by default might have points every 10MM. If you tell the machine to move to X10.0 but because of the lead screw it moves to 10.02, you can then provide that difference so the motion planner can get to the proper point. This is on top of what we would call steps/mm for the axis. This allows changes over the length of the axis. Not necessary for belts, can be very necessary for screws.
For the M0/M1 commands:
These are typically "pause commands" in traditional G-code. M0 will provide a feed hold command until a cycle start has been pressed. The spindle continues to turn.
M1 does the same thing but is hooked to a switch on the controller called "optional stop". When the optional stop button is on(it is latched on, not momentary) the machine will stop just like an M0 and wait for the operator to press cycle start. If the optional stop button is off the machine ignores the command and keeps running. This is very useful when proving out new CNC programs and tooling.I admit I have not used the pause and resume commands that are in the firmware now. This would just help to bring Reprap firmware to industry standard on the subtractive manufacturing side.
Hope all that makes sense!
-
Auto squaring/calibrating by homing dual x and dual y steppers individually.
I also have an mpcnc machine that at some point I am going to swap over to a duet ethernet so I can also use it for 1 meter x 1meter x 15cm prints. It has dual x, and dual y steppers. One feature that the branch of marlin has that would be great on the duet would be to automatically be able to square off the x and y axis by moving all 4 motors independently to their own endstops
-
Auto squaring/calibrating by homing dual x and dual y steppers individually.
I also have an mpcnc machine that at some point I am going to swap over to a duet ethernet so I can also use it for 1 meter x 1meter x 15cm prints. It has dual x, and dual y steppers. One feature that the branch of marlin has that would be great on the duet would be to automatically be able to square off the x and y axis by moving all 4 motors independently to their own endstops
Hmm, curious. Does it have stops at each end of the axis? Presumably for that to work, the machine would need to have a fair amount of "slop" in the linear guides so that it can twist? Or is some other mechanism employed?
-
Hmm, curious. Does it have stops at each end of the axis? Presumably for that to work, the machine would need to have a fair amount of "slop" in the linear guides so that it can twist? Or is some other mechanism employed?
I have 8 endstops, min and max for each rail. Being a meter in length, and a mixture of stainless steel and 3d printed parts, and gt2 belts, you can get up to 2cm off square if you move just one of the motors whilst keeping the other stationary. Doesnt seem to be a problem in use though, as both motors move together to keep it square. I have successfully milled aluminium on it, though usually I just mill wood or polcarbonate.
-
Hmm, curious. Does it have stops at each end of the axis? Presumably for that to work, the machine would need to have a fair amount of "slop" in the linear guides so that it can twist? Or is some other mechanism employed?
I have 8 endstops, min and max for each rail. Being a meter in length, and a mixture of stainless steel and 3d printed parts, and gt2 belts, you can get up to 2cm off square if you move just one of the motors whilst keeping the other stationary. Doesnt seem to be a problem in use though, as both motors move together to keep it square. I have successfully milled aluminium on it, though usually I just mill wood or polcarbonate.
That's fair enough - I have twin linear rails on my CoreXY which are only held by a single bolt at each end so if the belt tension isn't exactly the same both sides, it'll twist the axis. In fact, that's how I set the belt tension - push the X is to it's extreme Y position, then adjust the belt tension on one side or the other until it's square with the frame. Obviously once set, the belt tension will keep it square regardless.
Actually, on your printer, the fact that both motors move together will keep the axes parallel but not necessarily square. So for auto squaring to work, there would need to be some inherent "flex" in the system. I guess you could use M556 axis compensation but it's a manual process to set it.
-
Auto squaring/calibrating by homing dual x and dual y steppers individually.
I also have an mpcnc machine that at some point I am going to swap over to a duet ethernet so I can also use it for 1 meter x 1meter x 15cm prints. It has dual x, and dual y steppers. One feature that the branch of marlin has that would be great on the duet would be to automatically be able to square off the x and y axis by moving all 4 motors independently to their own endstops
This is possible with the Duet/RRF already. Use M584 to create two additional invisible axes (U and V assuming that you only have XYZ) like this:
M584 X0:3 Y1:4 Z3 U10 V11 E5:6:7:8:9 P3
Then when homing X, separate the 2 X motors into X and U and home them together:
M584 X0 U3
G91
G1 S1 X-300 U-300 F3000
…and then join them again:
M584 X0:3 U10
Similarly for homing Y.
-
Wow - light bulb moment. I've just realised that I can use this for homing my extruder CoreXY that sits above the hot end CoreXY. Currently I have to remember to check that they are lined up by eye before homing, as only the hot end CoreXY has end stop switches attached. This works because the extruder CoreXY has longer axes than the hot end so they don't have to be too precisely aligned but sometimes when I've been working on the printer, I forget and if the extruders are too far to the left or front, nasty things happen.
Quick question though. Presumably one has to define the other (additional) end stop switches using M574 U and V. But these switches would need to be connected to spare E stops (as there are no U and V estops labelled as such on the board). Can you point me to where I assign an En stop to an axis?
-
E0 endstop is for U and E1 endstop is for V.
-
E0 endstop is for U and E1 endstop is for V.
Brill!. I'm currently using E0 and E1 for emergency stops on axis maxima and a separate emergency stop switch but I can re-position these to use two of the estops on the Duex 5.
-
Would implementing Z axis backlash/hysteresis compensation be any easier than X/Y axes?
I am using a belt driven Z with a worm drive reduction. And as such, upon reversing travel direction, I have ~0.07mm of dead space… That's not really a problem for regular usage (one direction movement), but I would like to use mesh bed compensation eventually, and that would pose a bit of a problem...
