Extruder Concept . AM i mad

oliof

@o_lampe the filament is dragged along by friction between belts and filament. The pinch point issue isn't, and deformation of the belt during longer pauses isn't either (I am talking about weeks of idle).

achrn

@oliof said in Extruder Concept . AM i mad:

Latest actual working version is the Papillon / Papilio Lite (I was a beta tester):
https://kevinakasam.com/papilio/

What is the intended advantage? The website says "With the belts there are no metal teeth damaging the filament, but soft rubber belts pressing against the filament guiding it all the way" but I don't understand what the perceived problem is with "the small bites on the filament when the metal gears grab the filament" - they get eliminated in the meltzone.

oliof

@achrn A number of issues with teeth:

a) they elongate the material so extrusion is somewhat uneven. With too much tension on an idler this can lead to visible defects.

b) the typical dual gear extruders suffer from gear meshing issues which lead to "wood grain texture" since the gear meshing translates directly to slight deviations in the extrusion.

Back when I tested the Palatis FricEx I was able to see the difference in surface quality between a genuine Bondtech BMG and the Palatis FricEx on vase mode prints (using the identical printer with identical filament and identical gcode), and it translated well to the Papilio Lite.

c) a number of dual gear extruders have further issues due to tolerances between gears, axles, and bearings which again translate directly into the depths of the bites which affect extrusion efficiency.

A friction drive does not suffer from these issues because the transmission is indirect rather than direct.

Further advantagea of the belt extruder are that it's easier to use for co-extrusion (which was Proper Printing's premier reason to develop a belt friction extruder) and that the abrasiveness of the filament itself does not affect the extruder since it only grabs it, but does not bite it.

There are some certain drawbacks as well: The four-gear arrangements puts a limit on how small you can make these extruders, you need to hit good tolerances to avoid belt rubbing and material deposition, and closed loop belts aren't that ubiquituous. Also, at least with the Papilio you cannot adjust tension or assumed diameter, so low quality filament with variable diameter or pultrusion filament which often ends up with a lower diameter may not work too well.

(and yes, the hollow shaft extruder we discussed a short while ago also suffers less from the things above due to the reduced amount of knife-edge-to-filament contact compared to a typical dual gear setup).

Richard F

@o_lampe you could add a plate and spring to keep things even . i just didn't go mad with the design as i didn't know it had been tried before but a good obversion

Richard F

@oliof just an idea , ill have to watch those videos , i guess an idea is better than none

Richard F

@jay_s_uk thanks

Richard F

@Richard-F But i know what the 3d market needs is cheap affordable servo drives , i know there is "0-drive "
but an add-on for duet would sell like hot cakes

Richard F

@MJLew said in Extruder Concept . AM i mad:

"Proper Printing"

i just watched the vid , wow he put a lot of work into it , it was cool just seeing the proof of concept work , i guess I'm not mad lol . But it made my post useless now.

o_lampe

@Richard-F said in Extruder Concept . AM i mad:

@Richard-F But i know what the 3d market needs is cheap affordable servo drives , i know there is "0-drive "
but an add-on for duet would sell like hot cakes

There is also simpleFOC-mini, which is running a BLDC motor with step/dir interface by RRF in my DD extruder.
It uses a GM3506 gimbal motor and upped the available torque a lot.

An older version of O-drive can also be used (IIRC V3.6, before they went closed source) but that's hacker-talk, no mainstream stuff.

Richard F

@o_lampe thanks