LE TORRI NEL GRAFICO
-
@alankilian TUTTO OK
-
@luca-massimiliano COSA DEVO FARE ORA?
-
When I ask: "When you used the bed.g that I provided and ran a G32, what did your printer do?"
Saying "OK" is not helping me help you.
Please describe what the printer did and post the result of the G32
-
@alankilian LA SONDA BATTE FISICAMENTE X -20 E Y -15 , G32
Calibrated 6 factors using 10 points, (mean, deviation) before (0.266, 2.301) after (0.000, 2.301) -
@luca-massimiliano said in LE TORRI NEL GRAFICO:
Calibrated 6 factors using 10 points, (mean, deviation) before (0.266, 2.301) after (0.000, 2.301)
OK, this means you were NOT using the bed.g file I provided, but it looks like you are now getting great results.
I'm glad you got everything working now.
-
@alankilian NO PENSO SIA IL TUO FILE , PENSO CHE CI SIA UN ERRORE SU DOVE HO DEFINITO LA SONDA , ORA AZZERO I VALORI COSI DOVREBBE ANDARE AL CENTRO ? MIO G31 P25 X0 Y40 Z 4.875 ORA PROVO G31 P25 X0 Y0 Z 4.875
-
@luca-massimiliano said in LE TORRI NEL GRAFICO:
NO I THINK IT'S YOUR FILE, I THINK THERE IS AN ERROR ON WHERE I DEFINED THE PROBE, NOW RESET THE VALUES SO IT SHOULD GO TO THE CENTER? MY G31 P25 X0 Y40 Z 4.875 NOW I TRY G31 P25 X0 Y0 Z 4.875
If you used my bed.g file, the printer would have probed ten times at X=0, Y=0 and then reported "Error: Unable to calculate calibration parameters. Please choose different probe points."
It reported "Calibrated 6 factors using 10 points, (mean, deviation) before (0.266, 2.301) after (0.000, 2.301)"
This means you did not use my bed.g file.
It looks like you have everything working, so that is wonderful.
-
@alankilian G31 P25 X-12 Y30 Z 4.875 HO CAMBIAO OTTENENDO CHE LA SONDA COLPISCE 10 PUNTI X=0 Y=0 .MA NON MI DA ERRORE PERCHE?
-
@luca-massimiliano HO UOTTENUTO CON IL BED,G ORIGINALE G32
Calibrated 6 factors using 10 points, (mean, deviation) before (-0.936, 2.324) after (0.007, 0.693) ORA lancio g29. ma cosa ignifica(mean, deviation) before (-0.936, 2.324) after (0.007, 0.693) ? -
@luca-massimiliano ecco cosa capita , non compredo dove sia il problema
g29 immagino la costruzone della stampante e' molto incerta ma se riuscissi a stamare piccoli pezzi precisi potrei correggere gli errori della grossolana costruzione che potrebbero essere ovunque . devo ridurre il sondaggio g 29 e come?Warning: Skipping grid point (-40.0, -120.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (-20.0, -120.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (0.0, -120.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (20.0, -120.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (40.0, -120.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (80.0, -100.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (60.0, -100.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (40.0, -100.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (20.0, -100.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (0.0, -100.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (-20.0, -100.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (-40.0, -100.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (-60.0, -100.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (-80.0, -100.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (-100.0, -80.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (-80.0, -80.0) because Z probe cannot reach it
Warning: Skipping grid point (-60.0, -80.0) because Z probe cannot reach it -
This usually means that your grid has unreachable points due to the offset between probe and nozzle, or the machine cannot physically travel to those points. In all cases, altering the size of the grid would be the solution.
-
@phaedrux puoi aiutarmi a comporre definere una griglia ?
-
What does the resulting heightmap look like?
The grid could be left to match the size of the bed. You can ignore the grid points that are not reachable as long as the resulting heightmap is still useful.
-
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
@phaedrux HO SISTEMATO LA STRUTTURA DELLA STAMPANTE GRAZIE AD UN GROSSO CALIBRO. HO REGOLATO I FINE CORSA ,FACCIO SCENDERE VICINO AL CENTRO E DOPO AVER AZZERATO M666 , MISURO CON IL CALIBRO LA DISTANZA TRA LE SLITTE E IL BED ,DIREI PERFETTO ,POI LANCIO G 32 POI M666 E OTTENGO M666
Endstop adjustments X-1.70 Y-1.83 Z3.53, tilt X0.00% Y0.00%, MISURO COL CALIBRO E LE MISURE DELLE ALTEZZE DELLE SLITTE NON SONO PI' UGUALI -
@luca-massimiliano M666
Endstop adjustments X-1.63 Y-1.84 Z3.46, tilt X0.00% Y0.00% ORA DOPO G32 COME DEVO INTERVENIRE ABBASO FISICAMENTE IL FINE CORSA DI Z ? E DI QUANTO ? DI 3.46 VERSO IL LETTO? ORA HO RIPORTATO M666 A X Y Z 0 E NON HO ESEGUITO IL G32 N G29 , QUINDI SENZA NESSUNA CALIBRAZIONE HO OTTENUTO STAMPE COSA IMPOSSIBILE DOPO LE 2 CALIBRAZIONI. SAI DIRMI I MOTIVO . SCUSA SE HO SCRITTO maiuscolo era impostato -
M666 Endstop adjustments X-1.63 Y-1.84 Z3.46
I'm not positive, but I think this would indicate that the endstop on your Z tower is much farther out of position compared to your other towers.
Auto calibration can compensate I think, but the recommendation is to be within 1mm of each other.
https://docs.duet3d.com/en/User_manual/Tuning/Delta_calibration#m666-command
