Tool Board Heater Tuning Leading To Faults
-
@fcwilt @dc42
Here's my new, super simple configM550 P"ToolChanger" ; Set machine name M111 S0 ; Debug off M929 P"eventlog.txt" S1 ; Start logging to file eventlog.txt M555 P1 ; Set RepRap output G4 S1 ; Wait for expansion boards to start M308 S2 P"21.temp0" Y"pt1000" A"Ex1" M950 H2 C"21.out0" T2 ; Heater for extruder out tool 1 M307 H2 R2.063 C316.300:132.500 D6.10 S1.00 V24.3 B0 M143 H2 S300 M950 F11 C"21.out2" M106 P11 S255 H2 T70 M950 F1 C"21.out1" M563 P1 S"Tool1" H2 F1 G10 P1 S220 R205 M570 H2 P10 T25 S0.1 G29 S2 T-1 M501 ; Load config-override.g
-
boom, fault at 70c
It's most commonly faulting at 70c, which is when my hotend cooling fan is enabled
-
@kevinmar said in Tool Board Heater Tuning Leading To Faults:
M307 H2 R2.063 C316.300:132.500 D6.10 S1.00 V24.3 B0
@kevinmar said in Tool Board Heater Tuning Leading To Faults:
M501 ; Load config-override.g
Does that M307 line match what gets loaded by config-override?
-
@phaedrux always
-
And if you execute M98 P"config.g" does it show any errors?
If you delete config-override.g completely and remove the M307 line entirely from config.g, reboot the board and tune from scratch and save with M500 does it produce the same M307 line?
-
@kevinmar said in Tool Board Heater Tuning Leading To Faults:
boom, fault at 70c
Drat.
Does the fault occur when the temp is rising? peaked? dropping?
Did you leave all the tool boards connected?
-
@fcwilt All boards connected, happens ALWAYS when heating up. Never reaches peak or anything
-
@kevinmar said in Tool Board Heater Tuning Leading To Faults:
@fcwilt All boards connected, happens ALWAYS when heating up. Never reaches peak or anything
But it seems to be happening when the cooling fan kicks in?
Have you changed the temp of the cooling fan to see if the fault tracks that temp?
How about adding a M570 for that heater and increase the default P parameter value (5) to something like 30.
Frederick
-
@fcwilt Yeah, lowered the fan temp to 50, still faulted at about 78C.
M750 is at P10, will raise to 30
-
@kevinmar said in Tool Board Heater Tuning Leading To Faults:
@fcwilt Yeah, lowered the fan temp to 50, still faulted at about 78C.
M750 is at P10, will raise to 30
I'm interested to see which parameters affect when the fault occurs.
It seems we don't know exactly what condition is occurring that is triggering the fault.
Does a M122 report anything related to the fault?
Frederick
-
I'd still like to see a photo of the hotend in case there is something obvious.
-
@phaedrux said in Tool Board Heater Tuning Leading To Faults:
I'd still like to see a photo of the hotend in case there is something obvious.
Perhaps you know the answer to this question.
He posted a screen shot showing 3 heaters displaying a fault.
Does a single heater faulting cause all heaters to display a fault or did all three heaters have to fault at the same time?
Frederick
-
@phaedrux Ask and you shall receive
-
@fcwilt It's a printer with 4 tools, just so happened that the 4th tool continued heating to ~120C before faulting (different M307 parameters). All 4 tools have the issue
-
@fcwilt said in Tool Board Heater Tuning Leading To Faults:
Does a single heater faulting cause all heaters to display a fault or did all three heaters have to fault at the same time?
I can't quite tell from that photo, but is the heater block itself making contact with the body of the extruder, or is there an air gap exposing the heat break?
Is there any adjustability on the duct to lower it slightly to direct more air away from the block/nozzle itself?
-
@phaedrux The Hemera tool and V6 hotend are assembled correctly.
There is no adjustability to the fan duct, but the ducting is aimed down to the nozzle. It's a fan duct by Rene Jurack, evaluated by an aerodynamicist at BMW -
@kevinmar said in Tool Board Heater Tuning Leading To Faults:
@fcwilt It's a printer with 4 tools, just so happened that the 4th tool continued heating to ~120C before faulting (different M307 parameters). All 4 tools have the issue
When the fault occurs have you issued a M122 to see if anything related to the fault is reported?
Frederick
-
m122 === Diagnostics === RepRapFirmware for Duet 3 MB6HC version 3.3 (2021-06-15 21:45:47) running on Duet 3 MB6HC v1.01 or later (SBC mode) Board ID: 08DJM-9P63L-DJ3T8-6JKDD-3SD6M-9V4Z9 Used output buffers: 1 of 40 (16 max) === RTOS === Static ram: 150904 Dynamic ram: 63832 of which 12 recycled Never used RAM 139444, free system stack 200 words Tasks: SBC(ready,5.3%,298) HEAT(delaying,0.0%,325) Move(notifyWait,0.0%,302) CanReceiv(notifyWait,0.1%,799) CanSender(notifyWait,0.0%,374) CanClock(delaying,0.0%,339) TMC(notifyWait,7.4%,93) MAIN(running,87.0%,922) IDLE(ready,0.1%,29), total 100.0% Owned mutexes: HTTP(MAIN) === Platform === Last reset 00:01:48 ago, cause: software Last software reset at 2021-08-20 13:46, reason: User, none spinning, available RAM 139444, slot 1 Software reset code 0x0012 HFSR 0x00000000 CFSR 0x00000000 ICSR 0x0044a000 BFAR 0x00000000 SP 0x00000000 Task SBC Freestk 0 n/a Error status: 0x00 Step timer max interval 134 MCU temperature: min 38.9, current 39.3, max 39.4 Supply voltage: min 24.0, current 24.1, max 24.1, under voltage events: 0, over voltage events: 0, power good: yes 12V rail voltage: min 12.1, current 12.1, max 12.2, under voltage events: 0 Heap OK, handles allocated/used 0/0, heap memory allocated/used/recyclable 0/0/0, gc cycles 0 Driver 0: position 0, standstill, reads 14442, writes 16 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0 Driver 1: position 0, standstill, reads 14442, writes 16 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0 Driver 2: position 0, standstill, reads 14443, writes 15 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0 Driver 3: position 0, standstill, reads 14447, writes 11 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0 Driver 4: position 0, standstill, reads 14443, writes 15 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0 Driver 5: position 0, standstill, reads 14445, writes 14 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0 Date/time: 2021-08-20 13:48:32 Slowest loop: 60.53ms; fastest: 0.04ms === Storage === Free file entries: 10 SD card 0 not detected, interface speed: 37.5MBytes/sec SD card longest read time 0.0ms, write time 0.0ms, max retries 0 === Move === DMs created 125, maxWait 0ms, bed compensation in use: none, comp offset 0.000 === MainDDARing === Scheduled moves 0, completed moves 0, hiccups 0, stepErrors 0, LaErrors 0, Underruns [0, 0, 0], CDDA state -1 === AuxDDARing === Scheduled moves 0, completed moves 0, hiccups 0, stepErrors 0, LaErrors 0, Underruns [0, 0, 0], CDDA state -1 === Heat === Bed heaters = 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1, chamberHeaters = -1 -1 -1 -1 Heater 0 is on, I-accum = 0.2 === GCodes === Segments left: 0 Movement lock held by null HTTP* is doing "M122" in state(s) 0 Telnet is idle in state(s) 0 File is idle in state(s) 0 USB is idle in state(s) 0 Aux is idle in state(s) 0 Trigger* is idle in state(s) 0 Queue is idle in state(s) 0 LCD is idle in state(s) 0 SBC is idle in state(s) 0 Daemon is idle in state(s) 0 Aux2 is idle in state(s) 0 Autopause is idle in state(s) 0 Code queue is empty. === CAN === Messages queued 1033, received 5285, lost 0, longest wait 2ms for reply type 6049, peak Tx sync delay 7, free buffers 49 (min 48), ts 545/544/0 Tx timeouts 0,0,0,0,0,0 === SBC interface === State: 4, failed transfers: 0, checksum errors: 0 Last transfer: 1ms ago RX/TX seq numbers: 3860/3860 SPI underruns 0, overruns 0 Disconnects: 0, timeouts: 0, IAP RAM available 0x2c83c Buffer RX/TX: 0/0-0 === Duet Control Server === Duet Control Server v3.3.0 Code buffer space: 4096 Configured SPI speed: 8000000Hz Full transfers per second: 35.84, max wait times: 5.8ms/0.0ms Codes per second: 1.10 Maximum length of RX/TX data transfers: 6116/716
-
Thanks for the M122 dump.
Sure would like to know what condition is causing the fault. I'm surprised that information is not being displayed somewhere.
You mentioned that one heater took longer to fault. Were you able to determine what settings were different that might be relevant?
Have you tried disabling the cooling fan to see if it is playing a role in the fault?
Frederick
-
@fcwilt Yes, I've tried disabling the fan.
The heater that took longer to fault had different M307 parameters at that time