BMG vs clone test
-
Patents aren't meant to provide perpetual protection, but an initial exclusivity to recoup your initial research and development; so both your examples kinda fail on that point - generic drugs are only available after patents expire so its generally considered the patent holder have had enough time to profit and its time for capitalism to do its thing.
For some drugs I buy the "original" still because there are subtle differences in the non active ingredients even though the generic copies have an identical active ingredient, but once the patent did expire the price of the "original" did drop to face the generic competition.
-
Just had a look-see on the Bondtech site and I was unable to find any mention of 'patended'
I mentioned black gear vs white gear in my review - apparently the BMG extruders used to have white gears but they were changed to black as the white showed the black dust too much (ie the change was purely to hide the black powder) -
I built a Nema14 based custom extruder using BMG clone gears, and I didn't notice any filament grinding, nor black dust... I printed several kg of filament (especially during french lockdown), and a few long run prints, without any issue.
Frédéric
-
I've run both, and at the moment run clones because I can't afford the genuine. I'll upgrade when income allows.
My clone BMGs have given me far less trouble than my RepRap or Genuine Titan extruders. So far one hasn't croaked on me and I had two of my six machines running them for six weeks where I was hammering the machines with the virus face shields.
Regards costs the Bondtech team will be facing the dahmed if you do, dahmed if you don't situation. Chinese clone stuff can go injection molded because both overheads, labour, and materials are so cheap. This means there isn't the ~£10k hit that needs to be taken in manufacturing costs to move into injection molding. For more comparable environments to the UK this hit also forces a design freeze, because the tooling would nees to be rebuilt for any change. So BMG stay SLS and remain flexible in design while maintaing tollerances that are fit for purpose anyway. Yes there are some economies of scale with SLS but they will max out with a full build which is likely in the region of 125 parts, rather than needing part cost savings to give some return on investment for the tooling.
Finally of course if the current cost model is brining in what they need for the business why drop further?
Running 3 P3Steel with Duet 2. Duet 3 on the shelf looking for a suitable machine. One first generation Duet in a Logo/Turtle style robot!
-
@fma said in BMG vs clone test:
I built a Nema14 based custom extruder using BMG clone gears, and I didn't notice any filament grinding, nor black dust... I printed several kg of filament (especially during french lockdown), and a few long run prints, without any issue.
As I tried to express, there are very few circumstances where he clone fails (or grinds). The black dust could be an issue with just that one clone for all I know.
I had another look at things this morning and I still haven't figured out where the black dust is coming from. Other than gear to gear, there are no parts touching each other. If the dust is generated as gears are wearing in, you would only notice that if there was a substantial load on the gears (from let's say a long Bowden tube or the tension spring being real tight).
All-in-all, I stand by my assessment that a clone extruder is a far better value for your money. -
@DocTrucker In the OPs part of the world, the clone manufacturers also enjoy the benefits low or zero import tariffs compared to EU based manufactures because the EU trade agreement is yet to be ratified whereas the agreement with the CCP has been in place since 2014. EU member states tend to pay their workers a decent minimum wage too, rather than using modern day slave labour such as the Uighurs. Also, part of the OEM profit goes towards developing future products, whereas all the cloners have to do is sit back and wait, then steal that intellectual property. Then of course, the cloners are all part of the state so they don't need to make a profit. Or rather, any profit they make goes to the state to help fund their inexorable military build up and the next war.
-
@DocTrucker said in BMG vs clone test:
Finally of course if the current cost model is brining in what they need for the business why drop further?
I think that this is exactly what is going on. They probably did a study of overall profit vs price and found the sweet spot. Unfortunately their profit sweet spot does not match the value sweet spot the consumer gets to experience. Note that there is nothing wrong with making a profit. I just feel I get far better value for my money with a clone.
-
@deckingman said in BMG vs clone test:
lso enjoy the benefits low or zero import tariffs compared to EU based manufactures
eu will drop those rules next year, making all imports subject to VAT at least to even the playing field (we already have similar rules and i must say i don't think it'll have the intended effect, but the government get their slice so theyre happy)
-
@deckingman said in BMG vs clone test:
@DocTrucker In the OPs part of the world, the clone manufacturers also enjoy the benefits low or zero import tariffs compared to EU based manufactures because the EU trade agreement is yet to be ratified whereas the agreement with the CCP has been in place since 2014. EU member states tend to pay their workers a decent minimum wage too, rather than using modern day slave labour such as the Uighurs. Also, part of the OEM profit goes towards developing future products, whereas all the cloners have to do is sit back and wait, then steal that intellectual property. Then of course, the cloners are all part of the state so they don't need to make a profit. Or rather, any profit they make goes to the state to help fund their inexorable military build up and the next war.
While I agree with this sentiment in some respects, it fails to see the total picture. Like it or not, a very large percentage of products or part of products are manufactured in China (or other low cost manufacturing countries). You can't simply pretend that China is not part of the global manufacturing system.
It would be nice if you could but you'd see every product go up in price by a factor of ten or more and nobody could afford to buy anything. If we would simply say "let's not buy anything from China" then our way of life would pretty much grind to a halt .... and that's assuming we had the manufacturing capacity which we don't have. -
While I dn't really want to stirr the pot, it would be really interesting to look at Bondtech overall and see what would happen if all of a sudden it became illegal to source anything out of China.
Where does the raw material for their SLS printed cases come from?
Where do the SLS printers themselves come from? What about the components of the printers? Where did that ballpoint pen come from that the shipper is using or the printer that prints the shipping labels etc etc etc.
I think we would quickly find out that there is no way we could produce anything and it would take centuries to bring up the manufacturing machine to be able to produce our own bits (at a much much higher price) -
And without China, where would we find all these beautiful viruses?
-
@fma said in BMG vs clone test:
And without China, where would we find all these beautiful viruses?
I'm sure africa has more than ebola to offer, as will any place where humans can contact new species of small and large living things.
-
Taken to extremes the majority of components on Duet boards are likely sourced from east asia. Likewise I think many of our favoured companies sub contract manufacturing or source sub components from similar locations. Large 'capitalist' companies have basically built the 'communist' east asian manufacturing power house.
Running 3 P3Steel with Duet 2. Duet 3 on the shelf looking for a suitable machine. One first generation Duet in a Logo/Turtle style robot!
-
@jens55 said in BMG vs clone test:
While I agree with this sentiment in some respects, it fails to see the total picture. Like it or not, a very large percentage of products or part of products are manufactured in China (or other low cost manufacturing countries). You can't simply pretend that China is not part of the global manufacturing system.
It would be nice if you could but you'd see every product go up in price by a factor of ten or more and nobody could afford to buy anything. If we would simply say "let's not buy anything from China" then our way of life would pretty much grind to a halt .... and that's assuming we had the manufacturing capacity which we don't have.You do have the manufacturing capability - you could have bought a locally made Dyze extruder.
This is probably not the time or place for this discussion but I think the way of life as we know it may now be relatively short lived. For sure, 30% of everything worldwide is manufactured in China (including Duet boards unless I am mistaken). China also owns the majority of the of the worlds shipping and much of the worlds infra structure which moves those goods around the planet. Then if you look at what China is doing to it's own people, the recent events in Hong Kong, their activities in the South China Sea, the territorial disputes they current have with Russia, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Laos, Philippines, Malaysia Indonesia, South Korea, North Korea etc, something has to give. Then there are the swingeing economic sanctions that they have imposed on Australia for daring to ask for an independent enquiry into the origins of Covid. The western world is starting to wake up and smell the coffee but it may already be too late. After Hong Kong, Taiwan will be next on their list. Will the rest of the world stand by and let that happen? If so then what? The entire South China Sea area? The Philippines? Malaysia? Sooner or later, something will give and then we really are stuffed.
-
@DocTrucker said in BMG vs clone test:
Taken to extremes the majority of components on Duet boards are likely sourced from east asia. Likewise I think many of our favoured companies sub contract manufacturing or source sub components from similar locations. Large 'capitalist' companies have basically built the 'communist' east asian manufacturing power house.
East Asia is fine. Nothing wrong with South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Malaysia etc....
-
I'm sticking with my east asian comment as although the whole area isn't the problem, it is also not only China that's the issue that leads to UK/US/European manufacturing appearing extortionate. It's a problem borne from race to the bottom economics and requires governance that isn't afraid to do things that shareholder led businesses won't do by their own accord. Use money from import tarrifs to help comparative internal industries compete at near the same point.
-
Like most markets, the extruder market also has room for a spectrum of quality and price points.
For example, one of the most popular printers in the market, the Ender 3, costs about the same as a Duet 3 board, and still makes many makers happy,
-
@zapta spot on. Measured on does it get me to work, and over to my friends house in the evening a Bentley looks fairly crap compared to a Skoda.
Clones and copies are always going to be a contentious issue, but without the threat of clones and with no one copying each other to the slightest degree there would be far greater likelihood of profiteering which would make aspects of this pursuit/hobby/technology impractical.
Yes the BMG clones appear a direct copy of the bondtech units but in reality they are not. Different manufacturing methods and materials have been chosen that have allowed a significant per-unit cost saving in both production time, and improved production rate at the cost of flexibility. Along with reductions in quality control and customer support. Pay your money, take your choice. The fundamental innovation in the Bondtech BMG may have been new to 3D printing, but it was already in use for welding. So should they really be granted immunity from being copied just on the basis they borrowed a MIG wire feed mechanism and applied it to FFF machines?
If the real grumble here is the fact that some of the east asian countries can make things far cheaper than UK/US/EU countries or there is a particular grievance with a specific country then that is either the commentator having an issue with their governments import tarrifs/regulations, or indeed a political opinion on the country of source. While I may have strong feelings on both aspects I don't think this forum is the place to discuss these issues.
Running 3 P3Steel with Duet 2. Duet 3 on the shelf looking for a suitable machine. One first generation Duet in a Logo/Turtle style robot!
-
@DocTrucker said in BMG vs clone test:
So should they really be granted immunity from being copied just on the basis they borrowed a MIG wire feed mechanism and applied it to FFF machines?
sadly some patents are approved for using a non-novel concept in a pseudo-novel context, however not all hold up if challenged after the fact (admittedly i don't know, or care, if Bondtech has a patent)
-
@bearer yes some patents that I have seen granted are laughable. Traxas for example have been very actively patent hungry in the area of radio control model cars patenting things like using two servos instead of one for steering. Necessary evil but also not really fit for purpose.
