Compensate for Z-Offset Inconsistencies?
-
can you post a picture of your mesh bed level result?
-
It sounds like you're describing effector tilt.
-
@phaedrux Maybe! I’m going to check it out!
-
that is for delta printers.
you might have a tilt as well but that wont work on Cartesian printers. -
@veti said in Compensate for Z-Offset Inconsistencies?:
that is for delta printers.
you might have a tilt as well but that wont work on Cartesian printers.I was wondering about that as I was reading about it just now. I wonder why the equivalent isn't available for cartesian printers?
-
@veti Here you go,
-
You can see this offset difference clearer in this photo. On the left side the line of the ring is very narrow, and on the right it's smooshed down into the glass. 0,0 is the upper right BTW.
-
What kind of probe are you using?
On a side note, I personally went from dual steppers to just 2 leadscrews off one belt and have been really happy with the result. IMO, independent steppers are only worth it if you have 3 of them and can have a rigid bed mount.
-
@mike BLTouch
I have it do a tilt level before each print just to be safe.
-
I have a similar problem with one of my Ormerods and hadn't considered nozzle axis to bed normal alignment or more the the point variation.
Thanks! I will focus on my custom with a v-slot x-arm from now on and 'fix' the sloppy x-carriage another time.
