how to setup a hotend for directly printing metal and ceramic.

lynnmt

@dc42
when I run M307 per the docs,
https://docs.duet3d.com/en/User_manual/Connecting_hardware/Heaters_tuning#setting-the-model-parameters-manually

M307 H1 R1000 K300 D0.25 S0.1 V24

I get the error "bad model parameters"
are these values outside the possible ranges specified?

the command also fails as
M307 H1 R1000 C4 D0.25 S0.1 V24

soare0

@lynnmt External CAN temperature controller? This way you have control from gcode, and higher performance of controller.

lynnmt

@soare0
do you have a link to such a thing?
These exist?

dc42

@lynnmt your original command:

M307 H1 R1000 K300 D0.25 S0.1 V24

fails because K * D > 50. So reduce K or D to make it <= 50. I suspect the dead time of your heater is well below 0.25 (minimum currently supported is 0.1).

Are you driving the heater from a main board or from an expansion board?

lynnmt

@dc42

Even when i reduce the value to 0.1 it still fails. with the same "bad model parameters"

I am driving the heater from the main board.
it only draws about 40-60 watts of power.

dc42

@lynnmt this works for me for heaters on both main boards and expansion boards, using firmware 3.5.0-rc.3+:

M307 H0 R1000 K300 D0.1 S0.1 V24

lynnmt

@dc42
I appear to be using reprap firmware for Duet 3 MB6HC 3.3.
DSF version 3.4.6

The command M307 H1 R1000 C4:2 D0.25 S0.2 V24.0
also fails with the same "bad model parameters " error.

soare0

@lynnmt Yes, they are, but interfacing would not be trivial.
I worked with some, some years ago, and being straight chinese, it was a pain to use their CAN bus protocoi (as it was rather suggested than described). If you say you are 5 year old technical, then you may not want to do such gymnastics.
I would suggest that maybe an Arduino, with CAN and a thermocouple adaptor, may do the trick.
Maybe working from a DUET CAN interface board, would be better than from a mainboard? I think this is what dc42 wants to suggest.
Anyway, if your requirements are so ... harsh, regular PIDs may not be your best option (usually they are not designed for such high speeds, but probably some custom controller, wich... may be done on Arduino too, or on any other board like this.
I needed to do such stuff a long time a go, basically some ramped ON-OFF controllers, for fast precision control, but this is something needing to be tuned ... in house.
Normal fast thermoregulators, means 5samples/second. Super fast ones, maybe 40/sec, like these:

https://www.tc.co.uk/temperature_control/HA401.html

But the fact you can sample with 1ks/s, means nothing. and I find rather difficult to believe that you need such a speed.

dc42

@lynnmt I suggest you upgrade to 3.5.0-rc.3 then. I know we widened the allowed model parameters at some stage.

oliof

@lynnmt you really should be updating to 3.4.6 at least (I also would suggest leaving out the SBC which has no benefit for your current use).

lynnmt

@oliof
I am using the SBC to avoid having to network interface with the Duet.
my internet is...unreliable at times.

lynnmt

@dc42

can I actually do this upgrade if i have a Duet 3 MB 6HC V1.01A ?

dc42

@lynnmt yes, firmware updates can be applied to all production versions of Duet boards.

dc42

@lynnmt said in how to setup a hotend for directly printing metal and ceramic.:

@oliof
I am using the SBC to avoid having to network interface with the Duet.
my internet is...unreliable at times.

Duets don't need an internet connection, just a local connection to your PC.

lynnmt

@dc42
so connecting over USB will do?

lynnmt

@dc42
Ok I will run this upgrade and get back to you.
Thanks for the help!

dc42

@lynnmt said in how to setup a hotend for directly printing metal and ceramic.:

@dc42
so connecting over USB will do?

A local area connection to your PC is best.

lynnmt

@dc42 You mean via a LAN (ethernet) port on the duet and on my laptop?

what are the risks of using the SBC here?

I kind of prefer to have the machine running separate from my main computer.

lynnmt

@soare0
I want the simplest possible solution that works reliably without too much burden on the user and costs the least amount in the long run.

The conditions of printing metals and ceramics are harsh by default. I am designing around expectation values for a temperature control system that needs to at least keep up with the speed of phase change in semisolid metals.

metals are dense, and excellent coolants. they also have extremely sensitive temperature specific viscosity behaviors. Their working windows are narrow, this necessitates very fast thermal cycling to enable rapid adjustments to changes in flow conditions at the deposition region. The hotend I built is designed to position an extremely wear resistant(about mohs 8.5), non-wetting(to most molten metals), high surface power density (1-10 watt/mm^2) heating element as the nozzle tip in the deposition zone. the faster we can measure and control temperature, the closer we can get to printing pure metals which have windows as thin as 1/10th of a degree C.

this heater is very fast on its own, and has more than sufficient power density to keep the material flowing,and heat the underlying/surrounding layers to bonding temperature while overcoming surface conduction losses.

Hence, fast control and sensing is really needed...

T3P3Tony

@lynnmt no issues with using SBC mode or networking to your machine. In the long run some users will want to use one or the other based on other needs. I think @oliof meant not using SBC mode for now just to make is simpler for troubleshooting.

Please upgrade to 3.5rc3, then we can work tos get the model of the heater tuned in, the thermocouple isolation sorted etc before going back to the SBC vs Standalone considerations.

The control for all this is done in RRF, your method of connection does not matter at this point.

Is your understanding that the 4Hz control loop is not fast enough for your use?