Indirect (bearing) laser filament monitor concept

taglia

@brunofporto Apologies for the long silence, it took me a while to get to some good results. I have now managed to print for a couple of days with consistent results and no sudden pauses. The sensor also saved a big part that I was printing (no more filament).

The cause of my problems was the filament sliding on the bearing, and this caused negative reads. I have found this product at a local shop, sprayed two layers on my bearings, and the sensor seems now stable, even at high speed. I have also increased the pressure a bit and reprinted the mount with black eSun PLA+, which appears to be stronger than regular PLA.

This is the model that I am currently using. I was too lazy to remodel the attachment to the extruder, which I had already designed in Fusion 360: this is the STL imported by the OpenSCAD file.

These are the bearings.

3dmntbighker

Anybody determine the optimized number for "E" with an indirect bearing setup? I see someone using E5, but I get no data with E5. E4 seems to work.

Duet3D laser filament monitor v1 on input 3, disabled, allow 10% to 75%, check every 4.0mm, version 1, measured min 17% avg 30% max 47% over 246.5mm

Duet3D laser filament monitor v1 on input 3, enabled, allow 10% to 70%, check every 4.0mm, version 1, measured min 14% avg 29% max 54% over 2218.6mm

BTW, what is different about the version 2 sensor? Or is it a firmware difference?

danzaywer

@Crash69 said in Indirect (bearing) laser filament monitor concept:

5x10x4 (mr105)

Hi everyone, I just published my interpretation for a Duet3D laser filament monitor enclosure. Use a rubber band and have moving parts.
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4147811

radekzl

Thank you very much for your idea. I do little improvement on bearings I put there black heat shrink tube. Between bearings and heat shrink tube I put chemoprene glue and everythink works fine. Surface is black and scanning is stable:

Duet3D laser filament monitor v1 on input 4, enabled, allow 15% to 250%, check every 6.0mm, version 1, measured min 154% avg 166% max 174% over 6397.2mm

This values are stable for all materials which I tested yet.

cabal2000

@brunofporto said in Indirect (bearing) laser filament monitor concept:

F623ZZ

Love this design, did you redesign for F623ZZ or will the present config work?

mitch

An interesting remix is out there as well.
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4341389

I found most of the parts on amazon but it can get a bit spendy. I would like to see the roller pulley as a micro switch so it could be used as a static filament sensor for startup and filament change macros.

Carbon Fiber Rod 5mm
https://amzn.to/3agj6Mc

U604 Bearing
https://amzn.to/2PE3Wa4

MR95ZZ Bearing x 2
https://amzn.to/3fJYTPM

Embedded Bowden Coupling for Metal for E3D heatsink x 1
https://amzn.to/3akDv2N

Belt Tensioner Spring
https://amzn.to/3ijLIqD

Extruder PUlly 36T
https://amzn.to/31N5rsf

M3 Insert Brass Nut
https://amzn.to/3kqOkEO

mitch

@Adrian52 said in Indirect (bearing) laser filament monitor concept:

@dc42 Excellent advice. I have connected to stop 10 on conn_lcd using shielded cable (a repurposed USB cable that also has a ferrite ring), and the errors are now zero. I have got up to 3mm/second filament (0.5 width, 0.3 height at 60mm/sec) and the max/min were 107%/95% of the average. Wow.

@Adrian52 , Are you saying that by using the direct filament (stock so to speak) enclosure you are getting zero errors now that you have a shielded cable running from your sensor to the board? I am debating on attempting your indirect enclosure concept but if you had success by making a wiring modification perhaps that is a better way to fix this.

Also, Any chance you would want to factor in a roller micro switch into your mod so that the sensor can be used as a static filament present sensor as well?

JADoglio

@mitch

This is a really good design. Have you built one and tested it yet? Thanks

mitch

I am attempting to print the enclosure for it now. I could prob build a few because I will have a few left over parts. Parts are still on order. I am curious if a carbon tube would work instead of the rod. The design seems to show some notches cut so I went with the solid rod.

Adrian52

@mitch sorry for the late reply - been away. I have an early duet wifi, which apparently doesn't have optimal filtering capacitors on endstop inputs for the filament monitor. I have had no errors at all since using a conn_lcd input with a shielded cable.
I have not tried a static switch - I only have one printer, so the runout function of the monitor is fine for me.
I have found the indirect monitor arrangement excellent- the monitored total extrusion is usually spookily accurate.

JADoglio

@Adrian52 When you connect to the laser to the CONN_LCD header I assume you are using pins 9 (STP 10), Pin 1 (+3.3V) and Pin 2 (GND). Is that correct? If not can you be more specific on how you connected or better yet provide a picture? Thanks

Adrian52

@JADoglio Here is how I am connected to the conn_lcd input:
alt text , with the connection at the monitor:

This is the snippet from config.g:

;****rrf2******
;M591 D0 P5 C10 R200:400 E10 S0 A1		;extruder 0, laser w/o switch, e0 endstop, 40-160% range, 10mm, inactive (S1 active), check all motion
;****rrf3******
M591 D0 P5 C"connlcd.encb" R40:360 E10 S0 A1	;version for reprap3

As you can see I currently use the rrf3 version. Hope this helps.

JADoglio

@Adrian52 It helps very much. Thanks

JADoglio

@Adrian52 One other question. I have not found a good explanation for when to use the "S" parameter. When it is active does that mean the sensor will detect jams in addition to run outs? I assume when it is inactive it will still detect runouts. Any clarification on this parameter would be helpful. I am also not using the "A" parameter. Should I add that as well and what is its function. Thanks again.

Adrian52

@JADoglio my understanding is that with S1, the monitor pauses the print if the extrusion falls outside the specified range. So it will pause on blockages if the extrusion is sufficiently affected. I didn't think you got a pause with S0, even with runout - not sure if this applies with a microswitch added. I have only used A1 so far - will investigate A0 sometime. You do get a pause with S0 if you have a wiring fault - I had some irritating pauses until I fixed a dodgy crimp.

JADoglio

@Adrian52 Thanks. You are right even on run out when S is set to 0 it will not stop the extruder. I did that experiment a few days ago and just forgot about it.

mitch

@Adrian52 what does the A parameter do? I don't see that defined on the reprap g-code wiki site.

droftarts

@mitch see https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Gcode#Section_M591_Configure_filament_sensing

An (firmware 2.03 and later) 1 = check All extruder motion, 0 (default) = only check extruder motion of printing moves (moves with both movement and forward extrusion)

Ian

JADoglio

@droftarts Thanks

KipK

I'm waking up this topic, ( deleted mine also ).

Here is my version of indirect filament reading, inspired by your ideas here.

It uses an 5mm shaft hobbed gear from Bondtech and U shape bearing on the latch.
Tensionning can be adjusted from the latch.

I use it outside of my DD carriage, don't have any problem with retractions ( considering I have 0.6mm retracts this prollyt explains why ).

https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4882602

I get readings from 188% to 266% , average 230%. Is it acceptable or should I try to read around the 100% ? I think I can tweak it by adjusting the printed wheel diameter.