@poofjunior glad to see it reach this stage! I've been interested in the jubilee concept since I encountered parts on the SeeMeCNC site.
I think my next built will still be a Rostock V5 but I'm going to follow this to see reviews from more people and see how the tool system comes along.
I wanted to add this has been a educational thread for me as to some of the constraints on Delta designs.
I don't know if I would switch to a smart effector over the SE300 but a revision that includes this would make me give consideration to losing the print area outside the triangle of the towers.
@Danal You found the problem. 
Used wget this time and it works now. Must have just right clicked in the rush of setting things back up with the new install.
./DuetLapse.py -camera usb -detect layer -pause no -duet 192.168.1.212 camparms -parms -r 1920x1080
functions fine
@nikscha I think it could be useful for some of those things but I would caution against replacing the strain gauge as the has been tried before for Deltas with the HE280 hotend from SeeMeCNC.
The strain gauge is more accurate and has worked better than accelerometer only. It could be great combined but I wouldn't go entirely over.
I thought I remembered this was possible long ago and I checked the Wiki.
https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Gcode#Section_M557_Set_Z_probe_point_or_define_probing_grid
You used to be able to define the probe points on a Cartesian bed like you can with a Delta back in the 1 series firmware.
It sounds like Phaedrux thinks it might happen again some day.
I do hope that we keep with screw terminals as it lets me use a wide range of heaters and setups without having to buy another expensive crimping tool.
Using a thermistor/PT1000 with extra wire length is not a problem due to the size and flexibility of them. But heater wires are another matter and when you use custom, experimental, or different hotends and heatsinks it needs to be flexible.
It won't be fun to be limited on compatibility because you can't find a heater with the right length.
I'm still hopeful someone will post instructions I can follow for converting a Duet2Ethernet to d2+SBC as I'd like to have the extra processing ability for some of the hoped to have plugins.
@NitroFreak do you have a test you recommended?
@Phaedrux the running twice is because the normal process for a Delta is repeated G32s until the value converges on a acceptable value (typically >.05 for a good stiff build and >.1 for cheaper ones). Then M500 and provided nothing shifts one or two G32s should do you.
As to the why of the outside bounds I'm not sure. The fixing by resetting makes me think that something is up with the config-override being generated.
Could you give us the output from editing the bed.g to change the S parameter on the final G30 command to S-1 to get a report only?
So at the start of one of the macro's I use on my Delta printer the macro leads with:
M291 P"FIRST PROBE PRINTER SETUP: Did you delete heightmap.csv and config-override.g? To Continue Click OK" R"SETUP PRINTER" S3
In 2.0.7 and 2.1.1 it worked. However, in both 2.1.4 and 2.1.5 the pop up has no text or cancel. Only a gray (I am using the dark theme) box with the words "OK" displayed.
Has something changed about how M291 should be configured?
Board: Duet 2 Ethernet
Firmware: 2.05_1
DWC: 2.1.5
Delta - Rostock V3.2 design
I'm hoping to use Home Assistant to turn on a HEPA filter that is powered off a HA plug strip. This way depending on the filament configuration it either turns on automatically at the start of a print and off once a certain time after completion or turns on after print completion and runs for a timer.
HA can control the fan and timer and just needs duet to tell it the print reached a milestone (set on the duet side when start or end of print macro is triggered per filament.
I've also got MotionEye cameras that feed into HA and if I could start or stop a print from HA I would have those buttons on the page with the camera views.
Last reason I'd like HA integration is I have touchscreena around the house that control things in HA and if duet had integration I could just walk up to one of those and change tabs with the existing build instead of having to larch something else or modify the build.
@coseng
Have you looked at Curate 5.0s variable line widths? That seems to be taking aim at your problem of the cad and the nozzle not being multiples.
@phaedrux said in hase anybody converter duet wifi to ethernet?:
@oliof said in hase anybody converter duet wifi to ethernet?:
@baenwort I don't think duet 2 hardware with SBC will be getting the new features either but I may be wrong about it.
Only in the sense that the SBC would allow for some greater flexibility, but firmware wise, no.
I wouldn't make the change to SBC mode in the hopes of something greater in the future, only if you required something it provides currently.
Ahh, darn.
My hope was the off boarding of calculations and functions to a SBC would enable those newer features to work but perhaps I've been misunderstanding how much the SBC offloads work from the Duet board?
Yes, the tricky one I'm still looking for a good guide is adding a single board computer (SBC) to the Duet2Ethernet boards. With the news that firmwares beyond 3.4 are going to have features the Duet2's can't handle I'm wishing to add a SBC to my board so I can keep up.
Do you mean v3.2.2 as I don't think v2 firmware got past v2.05_1?
If you want to have a example the SeeMeCNC provided version is running 3.2.2 and that should get you a configuration that is good upto firmware 3.3 firmware.
https://forum.seemecnc.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=111255
For 3.4 there are some more changes needed. I'm using the SE300 hotend setup so I'm not positive on which changes you may need for your modified configuration.
@bberger for my last three duet machines I did not have to crimp anything with a special or universal tool. Working with the hotend to customize for me has not needed customized wireing harness as all my changes are from the Smart Effector base.
I feel that universal crimps give poor results more often than good and a specifically designed tool should be used when the hardware was designed for one.
If we went to ferrule for the heater wiring I would personally have no problem as I do have a toll specifically for that. However, I would caution against it due to my desire to keep from forcing people to buy tools.
Perhaps one of the Duet people can correct me on the requirement to have a molex tool to build a Duet system?
I know several vendors of Duet boards in the US use alternative connects to the Molex ones due to supply but they are compatible with the male ends on the board.
@tekstyle did you find something or end up buying the Duet3?
I do hope that we keep with screw terminals as it lets me use a wide range of heaters and setups without having to buy another expensive crimping tool.
Using a thermistor/PT1000 with extra wire length is not a problem due to the size and flexibility of them. But heater wires are another matter and when you use custom, experimental, or different hotends and heatsinks it needs to be flexible.
It won't be fun to be limited on compatibility because you can't find a heater with the right length.
