@pcr Give me a link to the test
Posts made by AlexTh
-
RE: M566 P1 vs pressure advance
@pcr M572 D0 S0.07 is a more appropriate value, there is no underextrusion at the beginning of the line, but the outer corners of the model are slightly outward. For the perimeter, this value is not ideal.
-
RE: M566 P1 vs pressure advance
@pcr I've tried different values. Can't set up.
But I'll try again
-
RE: M566 P1 vs pressure advance
@pcr I can't find the PA value, because the perimeter prints well, and only the beginning of the line with high underextrusion.
-
RE: M566 P1 vs pressure advance
@t3p3tony I am a new RRF user. I did not install other versions.
-
RE: M566 P1 vs pressure advance
M566 P1 vs M572 D0 S0.11 - Incorrect printing occurs at these values.
This is visible after moving to a new part. -
RE: M566 P1 vs pressure advance
@phaedrux I understood how to insert photos. I didn't see on the phone that the chat functionality doesn't fit on the screen
-
RE: M566 P1 vs pressure advance
@phaedrux The printer is currently in operation. I'll take a photo tomorrow. I didn't understand how to insert photos here.
-
RE: M566 P1 vs pressure advance
@phaedrux Re-extrusion during the printing of the filling at the "Line" in Cura. Underextrusion after retraction and transition to printing the next model on the table.
-
M566 P1 vs pressure advance
Hello. M566 P1 (jerk policy 1) does not work together with M572 D0 S0.11 (pressure advance). If pressure advance is turned off, then it prints normally.
Board: fly_e3_pro (STMWiFi)
Firmware: RepRapFirmware for STM32F4 based Boards 3.4.0beta6_1 (2021-11-06)
Duet WiFi Server Version: 1.26-08S-D