CoreXY performance (max print speed) comparison
-
Now that's fast!! lol.
I don't know as much about VZbots, but looks like fairly standard nema 17's and metal plates? is this closed loop?
I'm working on a archetype - breakneck tool head with a rapido UHF. I'm hoping to be printing around 50mm^3/s with a 0.4mm nozzle! So far I'm all setup to go plaid with nema 14's and upgrade to aluminum plates on my 300mm voron 2.4
-
@michaelr123 it's a 4WD setup, using 2 X and 2 Y NEMA 17s. I was over juicing the motors somewhat at 4A and they're ran on 48v.
It's not closed loop. I would have to go for external closed loop drivers and the duet 1HCL caps out at about 800mm/s in closed loop mode.
I can also run the same printer and electronics on klipper -
@jay_s_uk, that is absolutely nuts, LOL! Can you actually print at that speed or is this just about non-printing moves? If printing speed is different, what is your best printing speed?
-
@jens55 i haven't attempted printing at that speed but its on my list.
i'm running a goliath hotend with a 0.8mm CHT nozzle so hopefully flow won't be an issue -
@jay_s_uk, a lot of filaments give a range of speed that the filament is made for. Absent of some high speed filament (never actually seen speed specs on these), most filament recommends speeds below 100 mm/sec. I can see pushing the speed to maybe 300 mm/sec but I can't see how 2100 mm/sec could possibly work.
I am looking forward to hear about your speed tests to see what is actually achievable. -
@deckingman said in CoreXY performance (max print speed) comparison:
Regarding CoreXY vs other kinematics, there is an inherent advantage in that for anything other than 45 degree moves, both motors contribute to motion.
Isn't that similar to standard systems? Slightly reworded: Regarding other kinematics vs core xy, there is an inherent advantage in that for anything other than axis parallel moves, both motors contribute to motion.
That said a big one has to be reducing moving mass - aside from Ultimaker style systems.
Running 3 P3Steel with Duet 2. Duet 3 on the shelf looking for a suitable machine. One first generation Duet in a Logo/Turtle style robot!
-
@DocTrucker said in CoreXY performance (max print speed) comparison:
@deckingman said in CoreXY performance (max print speed) comparison:
Regarding CoreXY vs other kinematics, there is an inherent advantage in that for anything other than 45 degree moves, both motors contribute to motion.
Isn't that similar to standard systems? Slightly reworded: Regarding other kinematics vs core xy, there is an inherent advantage in that for anything other than axis parallel moves, both motors contribute to motion.
That said a big one has to be reducing moving mass - aside from Ultimaker style systems.
Slightly off topic, but there is some irony with the CoreXY motion system, as I’ve seen several recommendations in the Voron community to print squareish parts at 45deg on the build plate to aid in eliminating surface artifacts. Lose out on some mechanical advantage, but reduce motor contributions to surface artifacts on 45deg moves.
-
@DocTrucker said in CoreXY performance (max print speed) comparison:
............. Isn't that similar to standard systems? Slightly reworded: Regarding other kinematics vs core xy, there is an inherent advantage in that for anything other than axis parallel moves, both motors contribute to motion.............
Not exactly. For pure X or pure Y on a CoreXY both motors contribute equally whereas on a say a Cartesian only one motor contributes. As the angle between axes increases, one motor will contribute less on a CoreXY but the first motor will contribute the same (everything else being equal) until we reach 45 degrees where only one motor contributes (but with the mechanical advantage of sqrt2 due to the gearing effect). On a Cartesian as the angle increases, one motor will contribute less as the second motor contributes more and without the mechanical advantage due to gearing.
-
As an update, I checked my driver's and found one of my motors was only running on like .5A...
Cranked them both up to 1.5A and everything got so much better, quality, resonance, max speeds. I'm not sure if I somehow bumped the potentiometer at one point or what happened there.
Unfortunately my 6HC board is v1.01, so no 48v for me. Maybe I'll swap it out it out for a 1.02 some day, but I've got plenty on my hands to figure out Can bus for the first time and swap everything over so I'll save that upgrade for another day. Now that I've got my duet 2 system running so well I'm a little sad to tear it apart, but it'll be fun to see how much more performance I can get with a duet 3 system.
Anyway, I still need to buy some cht volcano nozzles for my rapido, with standard brass volcano nozzles from E3d with abs at 250C I've found my max throughput to be around 45mm3/s for general printing to avoid under extrusion. .8mm nozzles really don't need to move very fast to hit that flow rate. .6mm nozzles move faster at that rate, but nothing too crazy for a stock voron. Getting a .4mm nozzle up to that rate is where I'm guessing AWD comes into play.
I know rapido uhf's claim they can hit 75mm3/s, not sure how possible that really is, but I would imagine with cht nozzles, cranking temps, and switching to high quality extruder like an orbiter will make improvements.
-
@michaelr123 said in CoreXY performance (max print speed) comparison:
............................. I know rapido uhf's claim they can hit 75mm3/s, not sure how possible that really is, ..............................
A lot depends on the filament. Something like PLA with a low viscosity will give a much higher volumetric flow rate than PET-G for example. When I was experimenting with 6 input, single nozzle multi-material hot ends, I tried some high flow rate prints using all 6 extruders in mixing mode, just out of curiosity. With a 1.5mm nozzle, 1.65mm layer width, 1mm layer height, I got and average flow rate for the entire print of 73mm^3/sec https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc8AciHjf4I but the best I could get with PET-G was around 44mm^3/sec using the same hot end, nozzle, layer width and layer height combination.
