Single axis "printer" possible?
-
Hi all,
I've been working on putting together a little rig for empirically testing hotend components (because I'm a giant nerd, I love data, and had an extra SKR 1.4 board laying around).
I have it set up with a basic extruder and groove mount block for pushing plastic, as well as with a second groove mount placed below a tiny linear axis. The idea is to write a gcode macro to take temperature measurements at 0.1 mm increments across the heat break.
Is it possible to just define a single axis, and still have it home that axis and accept subsequent move commands? Should I assign it to a non-XYZ axis name? Any other hints or suggestions?
Thanks!
-
@whopping-pochard in your homeall file, just remove everything and write g92 x0 y0 z0.
You will be able to "print". -
Most certainly.
What Duet hardware are you using and what firmware is it running?
It doesn't matter what you name the axis unless you need to use the Z probe features in which case name it Z.
You will have to write your own gcode files for testing of course.
Frederick
-
@jrockland Ahhhh that is what was tripping me up! Thanks!!
-
@fcwilt Thanks! Iām running the latest 3.x firmware on the SKR 1.4. My original Duet boards are all in actual printers.
-
@whopping-pochard said in Single axis "printer" possible?:
@fcwilt Thanks! Iām running the latest 3.x firmware on the SKR 1.4. My original Duet boards are all in actual printers.
I doubt you will be able to get it to work unless you use a Duet board.
Frederick
-
@fcwilt why not? its exactly the same firmware (although the LPC version does have a few limitations, only due to memory constraints though)
-
@jay_s_uk said in Single axis "printer" possible?:
@fcwilt why not? its exactly the same firmware (although the LPC version does have a few limitations, only due to memory constraints though)
Did you not see the "wink"?
I was just messing with him for not using a Duet product.
Frederick
-
Poe's Law strikes again!!
-
@whopping-pochard said in Single axis "printer" possible?:
Poe's Law strikes again!!
But I did include the wink as required.
Frederick