Plain old inductive sensor for Z height?
-
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07P5CH491/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1
out of stock but look for LJ18A3-8-Z/AX
If you havent got a plate yet check out ezflex
https://www.th3dstudio.com/product/ezflex2-flex-plate-smooth-or-textured-pei-coating/
-
@davidvh86 said in Plain old inductive sensor for Z height?:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07P5CH491/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1
out of stock but look for LJ18A3-8-Z/AX
If you havent got a plate yet check out ezflex
https://www.th3dstudio.com/product/ezflex2-flex-plate-smooth-or-textured-pei-coating/
Thank you.
So that's an 18mm diameter body on that one? Isn't that the one that triggers around 8mm from the bed?
-
@Corexy Do remember that when shifting build plate types - when using an inductive probe, the trigger distance can/will change. I've had good luck with the following in my config.g to rapidly setup.
; Z-Offsets - Read here: https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Test_and_calibrate_the_Z_probe ; G31 P1000 X23 Y5 Z1.240 ; PEI Sheet (Prusa) Offset MICRO SWISS NOZZLE ; G31 P1000 X23 Y5 Z0.85 ; Textured Sheet (Prusa) Offset MICRO SWISS NOZZLE G31 P1000 X23 Y5 Z0.64 ; Textured Sheet (thekkiinngg) Offset MICRO SWISS NOZZLE -
given the trigger distance to what the sensor actually triggers against doesn't change, maybe using work offsets is a cleaner option than changing the probing?
-
@bearer Work offsets are prob the more correct option, but since it only took a few seconds to change and reset the printer with the above method, it was good enough for me at the time. But this is one of the reasons why I'm shifting to BLTouch...
-
@Kolbi said in Plain old inductive sensor for Z height?:
@bearer Work offsets are prob the more correct option, but since it only took a few seconds to change and reset the printer with the above method, it was good enough for me at the time. But this is one of the reasons why I'm shifting to BLTouch...
Hi,
I don't setup my z probe in config.g.
I have a separate macro for that that I invoke in code before setting the Z=0 datum using G30 or before creating the height map using G29.
I also have a macro button that cycles the name of a dummy fan that I am using as a mode variable. When the probe config macro executes it checks the current name of the dummy fan and changes the probe settings accordingly.
Now in my case I am changing from "consecutive readings" mode to "average readings" mode BUT it could be used in the same way to change any other setting, like the trigger height for different materials.
I don't have to edit any code, just click the macro button to select the desired mode.
Just a thought.
Frederick
-
@fcwilt Nicely done, hence your prior research into variables - makes sense now.
-
@Kolbi said in Plain old inductive sensor for Z height?:
@fcwilt Nicely done, hence your prior research into variables - makes sense now.
While dummy fans are not ideal they allow, for now, what I wanted to do.
My code is much simpler now in the sense I don't have to edit anything to change the settings, just click the macro button.
I also have a "height map mode" dummy fan that controls the creation of the height map.
Before I had 6 different macros that I had to edit in/out of code. Now I have two unchanging macros and the mode variables.
Getting true variables is only part of the job. The dummy fan names displays in DWC like any other fan so I can see the modes at a glance.
We are going to need something new in DWC to allow displaying of variables to use this approach with variables.
Frederick
-
@fcwilt It didnt even occur to me the use/display of variables in DWC. That would be way cool, especially if you could assign the variable a title in DWC and display it's contents - just as anything else. Fingers crossed
-
@Corexy
yes, the smaller bodies seem to have a closer trigger range, which might be a big deal but i wanted a good safety margin.
