Making an epoxy granite machine base

[Nxt-1]

@DaBit said in Making an epoxy granite machine base:

I came up with the 3% by experimenting, and it was the mixture that I liked best. I was unable to vibrate or otherwise compact a muddy 8% w/w mixture (which is not that far off from your 20% v/v). The exact amount of expoy needed depends a lot on the stone mixture too.

I would consider using larger rock too; with sand only it becomes fairly fragile. Sieved and cleaned rock is easily available through aquarium supply stores. Might cost 15 euros for a 25kg bag, but oh well.
For the mixture: start with Fuller's curve and play around a bit by taking a 1 liter container, add coarse stuff, weight. Mix in the finer stuff until the volume starts increasing, weigh. Next finer sieve, weigh. Etcetera. That quicky converges to a maximum stone / minimum expensive epoxy mixture.

There is a very long topic on a Dutch forum about my machine. You might want to skim through it and use Translate when you find something of interest.

I corrected my typo, the 20% is actually by weight. And as a Belgian guy, I will gladly read through that forum

[DallasH]

I was thinking of lead shot mixed with epoxy, I worked for a composite company and we built High ebd audiophile Composite turntable base's and we used lead shot for extreme damping.

[mrehorstdmd]

Wouldn't it be even more rigid if you cast the vertical frame members into the epoxy/granite?

[A Former User]

@mrehorstdmd I think the minimum thickness would mean it would be quite thick (and heavy!) compared to just dampening the aluminium extrusion.

[zapta]

Very interesting, please post updates. My HEVO is on carpeted floor so I placed it on a MDF plate for stability but would like to go granite long term.

Found this on the RepRap site, may or may not be useful to you https://reprap.org/wiki/Epoxy_granite

[Danal]

You might ask around at places that sell/install granite countertops who does their cutting. If you then go visit that person, they will have lots of granite scrap. You can either buy it as-is dirt cheap, or have them cut it more to your exact dimensions and finish the edges, for a few more bucks.

[A Former User]

@Danal over here you can buy tombstones dirt cheap if they are damaged, our "stonecutters" don't do any manufacturing for last few decades, they import ready-made tombstones from PRC and here they just engrave the names, pictures... so if the tombstone is damaged they sell it dirt cheap

[A Former User]

We used to be able to get "expired" stones basically for free until the church realized it could be a gold mine to sell them for a price just a wee bit lower than a new stone after adding the cost of updating the engraving ... so it was cheaper to buy an import surface plate than a old tombstone. (And ultimately a lot less work than to get three and lap them flat:)

[Danal]

I never thought of tombstones. Just countertops.

[zapta]

@smece said in Making an epoxy granite machine base:

.. they import ready-made tombstones from PRC and here they just engrave the names, pictures...

Subtractive tombstones are so old school.

[deckingman]

@Danal said in Making an epoxy granite machine base:

I never thought of tombstones. Just countertops.

This gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "my printer just died"

[dgrat]

Some time ago, I put an old printer on a wood-styrofoam-wood sandwich, which kinda worked, but I noticed that an old towel was also reducing vibrations well. Atm I just use furniture sliders..

I believe, this epoxy-concrete solution is overkill and I am sceptical about the benefit. The rubber dampeners only work if mass is (very) high and are known to resonate. My guess is that an old towel under the printer will vibrate less than the epoxy-solution.

[DaBit]

Also, don't rule out regular concrete, the cement+water type. Many prefabs available, easy to cast in any desired shape if the desired shape is not available, and dirt cheap compared to epoxy concrete. 25 dollars/euros buys you a lot of concrete.
Very detailed shapes are possible with a bit of plasticizer and a finer aggregate mixture.

The main disadvantage of cement-based concrete for machine tools is shrinking. After the standard 28 days most of the concrete has cured and most of the shrinkage has happened, but the concrete continues to shrink for decades. Not really an issue for a 3D printer though. But if I ever build myself a larger CNC lathe I better take that into account.

[A Former User]

my family was making those countertops (artificial stone, it's some resin that comes in 50kg barrels and fillers that come in many different forms and sizes), it's cut with a regular tool (wood saw will go trough it no problem) nothing special about them but you cut openings for faucets etc .. there's no really "scrap" there as molds you use to make stuff are pretty good and efficient..

now, the huge granite/marble/heavy and hard base for milling I do understand (and use and...) but I'm not sure what would you get by using that as a base for printer ?! you need to stifen the printer as a whole, it can jump on the table it will not affect print quality if the printer is stiff ... the head "floats" above the print it's not like there's any force but inertia and that you won't solve with a heavy base ... if it's vibration/sound you are trying to solve, I keep all my printers on a special vibration dampening rubber feet made for washing machines and driers .. it reduce the sound a lot ... also filing the 4040 or 5050 profiles with sand reduces sound a lot (did not notice improvement on the print quality side) ... now, dunno how it all works for delta but I doubt it's much different

[zapta]

This is a video that CNC Kitchen did regarding vibrations and base. As usual he tried to take a quantitive approach.

https://youtu.be/OnfYA5QLA84

[TLAS]

FYI - mechanical engineer here

Resonance mode is proportional to mass, so increasing mass is a way to eliminate low-mode resonance (although not always effective). Dampeners (such as epoxy) don't eliminate the resonance energy much (~10%) but that would really only help you trying to limit energy / vibration into your stand (although some will reflect back up into the machine so it does still help).

In my opinion, the limiting factor of your design is the joint between your extrusion and your base plate. The mode of a plate with 80/20 extrusion as you have it is quite low. Increasing the thickness of your base mounting plate will increase your stiffness substantially (increasing your mode away from the motor resonance) as would adding some 90 degree stiffeners to your columns. Make sure you have a large amount of preload on the bolts as well - if you can find it, use a bolted joint calculator online to determine the bolt and the correct force to apply to it. Properly tightening the bolts can drive up stiffness as well.

Cross-beam supports would also substantially increase your stiffness (column to column). I'd advising putting them mid-span for greatest effectiveness, although it might be something of an eye-sore.

[Phaedrux]

I have my printer on a fairly solid wooden end table. The printer has some dense closed cell foam for feet. There was still a bit of vibration, so I ended up taking a large weight and using nylon strapping to basically tie the printer down to the table by hanging the weight underneath the table. It looks pretty ghetto, but it worked wonders.

[Nxt-1]

@TLAS Thank you for your insights, I will continue with the EG base and feet. After that I will evaluate and about reinforcing the joint between the extrusion and the base plate if needed.

I decided to make some test castings before doing to main job (duh I guess ). The test mold can house four pieces of 75x75x85mm with rounded corners and approximates the actual mold as much as possible.

For the 1st batch I made 850g of EG with 10%w epoxy, 90%w fine white sand and 10g of blue dye.

[A Former User]

wouldn't it be stronger with larger rocks? then again i think i read your smallest largest aggregate should be at most 1/3 of the smallest feature in your mold.

[Nxt-1]

@bearer said in Making an epoxy granite machine base:

wouldn't it be stronger with larger rocks? then again i think i read your smallest largest aggregate should be at most 1/3 of the smallest feature in your mold.

Well technically my largest aggregate size is at most 1/3 of the smallest feature in the mold But as I said I will do some experimenting with the materials that I already have and I'll go from there.