Bondtech or similar extruders (again)
-
0_1566556777334_config.g.txt
This is my config file -
@preb1 said in Bondtech or similar extruders (again):
TCMUK-3d
its says its compatible with an original e3d thermistor.
so its a semitec.
please use the values posted by Phaedrux -
OK. Update.
Printing the benchy after modifying the outlets made it worse.
Reverted back and this time I started the fan at layer 3. Fan at 75% and temp at 220 degrees. This time a marked improvement. The first 9mm (or 180 layers are ok.•No lumps and bumps) From then on it is perfect. I have to eat humble pie and say I do need cooling but I think my cooling duct needs refining as maybe its not quite hitting the right spot.
I altered the config as per values posted by Phaedrux but it made no difference to the temp. After taking readings with a thermometer the hot end is still at the indicated temp both before and after the changes.
Thanks to all for the advice. I certainly learnt something. -
@preb1 said in Bondtech or similar extruders (again):
I altered the config as per values posted by Phaedrux but it made no difference to the temp.
there is at least a 10C difference between those beta values at around 200C
-
@veti that value is actually correct when using the standard model the one Phaedrux posted is using the steinhart model which is the better way but both are valid. This is probably way the op found no difference in temp (they should both have been very close to each other)
-
the beta value for the semitec is 4276. at 200C there is about 10C difference to 4138.
-
@veti ah I get where you are coming from now The spec for the Semitec is 4138 but that of course is the 25/100 C rating which also why the std Chinese ones that quote 3950 are so far out at print temps because they are quoted even worse at 25/50 so they actually come out quite a bit higher (4008 at 110 IIRC) this is why the steinhart I believe is better because it takes that into account but I am no expert on them and TBH I would much rather use PT100's or at very least PT1000's
-
https://www.mouser.de/datasheet/2/362/semitec usa corporation_gtthermistor-1202937.pdf
The e3d thermistors are 104GT-2 Which have a beta value of 4276. See the above datasheet.Steinhard Hard is often used to derive a precise temperature of a thermistor, since it provides a closer approximation to actual temperature than simpler equations, and is useful over the entire working temperature range of the sensor.
The Semitec Thermistor is widely used and produces good results. The B3950 Thermistors as you say become very inaccurate at high temperatures as there are different ones that just behave the same in the 25-50C quoted range.
I moved to a PT1000 because of all of this as well. -
Not sure if this helps but I tested a Triangle Labs (BMG Clone). I had the same type of issues, inconsistent and poor extrusion. Despite my best efforts, removing it was the only solution to the problem.
-
@bricor said in Bondtech or similar extruders (again):
Not sure if this helps but I tested a Triangle Labs (BMG Clone). I had the same type of issues, inconsistent and poor extrusion. Despite my best efforts, removing it was the only solution to the problem.
Which one are you using now?
-
The most reliable filament drive has been the Bondtech QR (original not clone).
I have had a lot of success with the clone Bulldog using planetery stepper motors. I do not use the provided hob gear though, instead I use one like this.
https://store.makerstoolworks.com/products/hob?_pos=1&_sid=5f6be0946&_ss=rMore recently I’ve been working with the Voron Mobius 3 since the dual drive gear seems to be more reliable, especially with TPU/TPE (soft flexible) filament.
-
@preb1 said in Bondtech or similar extruders (again):
Coming back to this, i recently saw that this is a typical artefact for a too wide extrusion width compared to the nozzle width, coupled with maybe a bit too high of a temperature.
This may show in the benchy especially because of the drawn out overhangs.
