@dc42 Hey! Thank you for your response! It wont let me add three images to this response as they are too large, but I will add them to that original drive folder. I will also add their corresponding csv files. out of three tests, one after the other, the first two were quite close. However, the 3rd is quite a bit off from the previous two.
heightmap1.csv heightmap2.csv heightmap3.csv
Like mentioned before, please check the drive link for the corresponding images if needed.
Thanks again!
@gloomyandy Fair Enough. It may be a few days before I'll have access to the printer again, but I'll be sure to post a video when I do.
Also, we have been using the BLTouch to collect a "control" mesh, but since then the physical bed has been adjusted, so we'll have to do it again. Initially however, it seemed the SZP's results were pretty far off the BLTouch. I wonder if that is solely because of the PEI over the top of the steel sheet. There has been discussions that we may try to replace the printer bed to a more compatable material.
We'll also try the shorter cable as well as finding a better mount for the sensor board. cleaning up the wiring might prove difficult as it wasn't our team that did the wiring in the first place. so I'll leave it as a last resort.
Thank you for your help!
Anyone have any further ideas on this issue? I am still experiencing the same problem
@o_lampe I don't think it's impossible, but I figure I would then see larger discrepencies at the far end of the scan. However, between scans, the difference between the points is more generalized across the entire bed. I'll be sure to bring that up with on of the mechanical engineers though
on second thought it is now letting me add them to the forum so here are the screenshots as well.
@dc42 Hey! Thank you for your response! It wont let me add three images to this response as they are too large, but I will add them to that original drive folder. I will also add their corresponding csv files. out of three tests, one after the other, the first two were quite close. However, the 3rd is quite a bit off from the previous two.
heightmap1.csv heightmap2.csv heightmap3.csv
Like mentioned before, please check the drive link for the corresponding images if needed.
Thanks again!
Hello All,
I am currently working as part of a senior design project. Part of this project involves setting up the duet3d Scanning Z Probe which I am having a little trouble with. The probe appears to be working correctly, however the bedmesh I receive is fairly imprecise. This is confirmed to be the case by running G32 twice and comparing the values of the two csv files. In some cases there was a discrepency of almost a mm.
I am assuming this has to be something wrong with the configuration of the probe, but I haven't had much luck finding it.
here is a drive link to the photos of the printer setup. This setup uses scara arms
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1G-H6trTQf60f8WWwskZQpR35paG2lsit?usp=drive_link
I have also included the relavent GCode files
config.g bed.g
let me know if anything else is needed, and thank you in advance for your help