@jay_s_uk Oh man, you're right. I updated DWC but for some reason the actual RRF didn't update. I fixed it. Will try again.
Best posts made by Tinman
-
RE: M291 S=5 under RRF3.5 Beta
-
RE: How to Copy Axis Position Into a Variable?
@OwenD This is the very definition of a helpful answer. Amazing when it is explained properly how you think to yourself "that was so easy, why couldn't I figure it out?"
-
RE: How to get DWC to Display what line of Gcode it is on?
@Phaedrux I'm part of the Millennium Mills design team. I'd be happy to show you how our Milo CNC mill works and how this specific problem is affecting efficient toolpath generation. I think you're also in Canada so I could show you live if that works. I've been avoiding further macro generation because I don't want to recommend these methods to our users if this can't be fixed.
-
RE: How to get DWC to Display what line of Gcode it is on?
@AndyE3D OK, I think I found out the cause of the problem- at least I have a theory... In my macro I had the z probe macro and xy probe macro making three samples and then averaging them to come up with the final WCS figures. The averaged figures have more decimal places and this seems to mess with the ability of the board to process a longer multi-machining-process file. When I remove the averaging procedures from the probing macros everything seems to run fine.