@Esteban
Problem solved!
It really wasn't a big deal, I just had two probes to configure and my Z axis end stop was one of them (I had left the basic Reprap configuration). And when probing, each probe could be individually triggered and mislead the probing by scanning the bed.
So I'm giving you the corrected configuration for those who have this problem.
@dc42
C'est une pince relativement grand, environ 50mm de diamètre.
Je vais tacher de faire ces meusures
@achrn
Non je n’ai changer aucun autre paramètre.
Pour ma pince, c'est une pince professionnel mais je ne trouve pas ses caractéristiques.
Je vais tacher de voir en contactant directement mon lit momentanément a l’alimentation pour vérifier mes résultats.
Et de modifier mon Gcode
Thank you very much for all your answers, they help me a lot to understand the various functions.
So far I'm still on 3.5 but I'm going to switch to 3.6 with the installation of the new cards.
When I talk about “error correction”, I'm talking about holding in position. I didn't know if it was the 1XD that took care of this or if it was the boxes of the different external controller kits. But now I know.
Indeed, on a CL-42-T controller I dismantled, I couldn't find much electronics, which is where this question came from.
On the other hand, one last question: for very complex machines with a large number of axes, would it be more “efficient” to have a main 6XD and then add 1XDs and another 6XD in daughter mode?
@infiniteloop
No, everything has always gone smoothly. But if I max out at 6.8 * 24 = +/-160W and 1.7 * 24 = +/-40W, could that explain why there's no voltage drop?
Hello everyone,
I'm going to add 3 new boards to one of my machines.
And I'm in dire need of information that I can't seem to find or understand.
I'm trying to find out how (in a rather basic way) data is shared and processed in a Duet environment with expansion boards.
My first question arose from the fact that my machine, equipped with a single Duet 3 Mini 5+ card, shows artifacts when turning at “high speed”. I've carried out numerous speed and acceleration tests, and yet (without exceeding the mechanical limits of my printer) at high speed, it still lets gohsting appear in combined/complex movements such as bends, exceeding 120mm/s. So I wanted to know if it's possible to saturate the Cortex M4? And if so, does it simplify calculations for the various movements? In my case, there are two X and Y motors set at 400 steps/mm for a speed of more or less 120 to 150 mm/s for a slicer part with Cura, which has a motion resolution setting of 0.01mm.
My second question is whether there's a way / a calculation to know if the calculations required of the processor by GCode are too complicated or not?
In the case of expansion board connections, a 3HC, which board will perform PWM, motors and temperature monitoring calculations? In a certain logic, each board only performs the calculations for its own sub-components (except for the main board, which also reads the code and compiles the information received by the CAN to display it on the screen)?
SBC mode can help relieve the main board of certain calculations?
My machine will soon have two servomotors in a loop connected to a 1XD daughter board, and I'm wondering if there might be a slight latency between the two 1XD boards (the X-axis and the Y-axis)? Especially in combined movements ...
Finally, I can't quite figure out who sends the correction command to the motor in the event of an error between the 1XD and the integrated box (for example, with a Cl-42-T box or much more powerful industrial boxes).
Many thanks for helping me out on this front.
@jay_s_uk said in Low heating element current:
maybe the rating of the bed and the hotend heater?
For the trays, no, it's a 320W. As for the hotend, I confess I haven't tested it with more powerful heaters, but I'm pretty sure I have a 60W (Chinese, but normally not the cheapest of all).
Hello everyone,
I'm going to install three new boards on one of my machines.
Just as a precaution, I'm interested in monitoring the temperature of my boards, but I can't find out if these two different types of board have an integrated temperature sensor like the Mini 5+.
Is this the case?
What are the commands to attach to my config.g if this is the case?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Hello everyone,
I'm experiencing a slight problem with the output current of my bed and hotend. Nothing alarming in the sense that they work and to my knowledge have always worked like that, but in the need to heat my machine much faster, I checked my amperages:
*to the current clamp
My board is a Duet 3 Mini 5+, so I should be able to get 15Afor the board and 5A for the hotend. However, this is not the case. There's no limitation on my power supply (LRS-350-24 MeanWell), whether the elements are switched on separately or not, the values remain approximately the same.
Where could the limitation come from? I don't have PWM limitation for my M307 controllers.
M950 H0 C"out1" T0 ; create heater #0
M143 H0 P0 T0 C0 S285 A0 ; configure heater monitor #0 for heater #0
M307 H0 R2.43 D5.5 E1.35 K0.56 B0 ; configure model of heater #0
M950 H1 C"out0" T1 ; create heater #1
M143 H1 P0 T1 C0 S115 A0 ; configure heater monitor #0 for heater #1
M307 H1 R2.43 D5.5 E1.35 K0.56 B1 ; configure model of heater #1
@dc42
Thank you for your reply,
On my M122 order I don't get any error on my drivers. So I looked at other motors and also the continuity of my lines and everything seems correct. On the other hand, what seems strange to me is that I only had one motor connected to my Mini 2 expansion card and neither of the two drivers is working. When I damage a driver, for example by making one of my axes move too fast, should I only damage one driver?
@Esteban
Can installing an end-of-course max stop prevent this kind of problem or will the movement be proiritory on the stop? If not, will the stops remain active when the M564 S1H0 command is sent?