Sorry for the delay in responding.

I spent the weekend and every night this week running tests and tweaking my Cura settings. I also reran my tests for extruder steps calibration and all the tests as outlined in the "Mat's Hub" document here.

The results look like this.

There has been a distinct improvement in the original issue as seen here with the central under extrusion..

... which now looks like this;

This this been achieved by a change and test process of printing temp, retraction tests, extrusion multiplier tests along with a few other maintenance tests.

As you can see I still have work to do to stop the rounded corners on the last two right-hand pillars, and there is some warping of the base. I'm going to start playing with dropping the bed temp by 5% intervals and see if that helps.

Replaced the cabling from the PSU to the Main board power connector with good quality AWG12 silicone cables. Tested the heated bed for signs of heating and there was no issue. This one's fixed.

Actually, forget that. I just ran the temp tests again on both bed and extruder and they are sitting steady at the requested temperatures (Bed = 60 Extruder = 190). I think that my PID tuning has been successful.

Sorry for the delay in responding.

I spent the weekend and every night this week running tests and tweaking my Cura settings. I also reran my tests for extruder steps calibration and all the tests as outlined in the "Mat's Hub" document here.

The results look like this.

There has been a distinct improvement in the original issue as seen here with the central under extrusion..

... which now looks like this;

This this been achieved by a change and test process of printing temp, retraction tests, extrusion multiplier tests along with a few other maintenance tests.

As you can see I still have work to do to stop the rounded corners on the last two right-hand pillars, and there is some warping of the base. I'm going to start playing with dropping the bed temp by 5% intervals and see if that helps.

I am trying to fix an issue I see when printing, in this case using a series of angle tests. I spent yesterday running tests to dial in my retraction settings and today wanted to try and figure out why I am seeing warping in prints that employ and overhang element.

The one in particular I am trying to fix is an error in the printing of the DII Cooler. Namely warping around a nut hole. On this version the hole is intended to be elongated (I assume to help with positioning) but the area around the hole has warped.

In the photo you can also see that I am seeing what appears to be missing or skipped layers and I am trying to resolve this at the same time as the warping (I should maybe be focusing on one at a time).

So to test progress I setup to print the angle test by Schematix on Thingiverse.

I performed my usual pre-print tests, Z-Alignment, bed leveling, Bed cleaning etc. I then started the print with the following settings;

Wanhao Duplicator i3 V2.1

Duet3d Wifi Firmware: 2.02(RTOS) (2018-12-24b1)
Web Interface Version: 1.22.6

Cura 4.2.1

Resolution: 0.3mm
Print Temp: 190
Initial print temp: 180
Build Plate Temp: 60
Flow: 100%
Retraction enabled
Retraction Distance: 1.3mm
Retraction Speed: 25
Print Speed: 60
Travel Speed: 120
Initial Layer Speed: 30.0
Cooling Enabled
FAN Speed: 100
FAN Regular Speed: 100
FAN Max Speed: 100
Support: No
Build Plate Adhesion: Skirt
Skirt Width: 3
Print Sequence: All At Once

The angle test print came out as follows and you can see that there is what looks like missing layer on stacks 2,3 and 5 but not on 1, 5 & 6

This leads me into my confusion (and thereby my question) about what term I should be searching for when trying to find a solution. What is presented in this print could be classified as a "missing layer", but it coulds also be classed as "temperature variation" or even "Inconsistent Extrusion". I don't know the correct diagnosis of what I am seeing in order to be able to search for a solution.

Any suggestions please. Has anyone else experienced this and how did you resolve it please?

OK, that's all fixed. I closed Cura and restarted, the entry appeared and this time contained the setting "28". I set this to zero and the message has gone. I looks like I either ignore future messages or just remember to go and set that entry to zero before proceeding.

Actually, I kept increasing the retraction and eventually the "tail" disappeared. I needed to increase retraction to 1.3mm before this happened.

.. And it doesn't actually help if I don't tell you the settings I am using in Cura. Sorry, here are my Cura settings.

Resolution: 0.2mm
Print Temp: 200 and later 195
Print Temp Initial Layer: 200 and later 195
Initial print temp: 190 and later 185
Build Plate Temp: 60
Flow: 100%
Retraction enabled
Retraction Distance: 1mm
Retraction Speed: 25
Print Speed: 60
Travel Speed: 120
Initial Layer Speed: 30.0
Cooling Enabled
FAN Speed: 100
FAN Regular Speed: 100
FAN Max Speed: 100
Support: No
Build Plate Adhesion: Skirt
Skirt Width: 3
Print Sequence: All At Once

@mrehorstdmd OK, I took your advice and focused on using calibration cubes to set retraction first. Here are the results and it's clear that the farther away from 1mm the worse it gets.

One strange artifact that appears on all these cubes is the "tail". It typically appears on the first cube and varying lengths in between but always presents again on the last cube.

Any thoughts on what might be causing this?

@grizewald Thanks, unfortunately it is already set to zero.

@veti Oh, I've not been using any plugins, didn't even know about the Duet plugin but will go take a look now. Thanks.

Yes, g code flavor is set to RepRap.

Hi

I have started seeing the error message "Error: M141: No chamber heater has been configured for slot 0" following an upgrade to the latest version of Ultimaker Cura (version 4.2.1). I see from other posts that this is an error message that can be ignored and that if you interrogate the gcode produced by Cura you can see the M141 line.

This seems to be a new addition and I was wondering if anyone had managed to find the setting that triggers this message (so I can turn it off). It's that of [a]. Live with it or [b]. Manually edit the line out before every new print.