Just for prosperity if others come across this thread in the future, I finally got around to updating to RRF 3.4.x and the implemented change works great. I can now correctly define the servo with the needed PWM frequency like so:
M950 S0 C”duex.pwm5” Q333
And then move it with the servo commands like so:
M280 P0 S45 ; set servo position to 45 degrees
And it moves a sensible amount as expected.
Is there any reason that G10 tool offsets cannot be applied to the ABC axes?
The documentation has parameters for X, Y, Z, UVWnnn but not ABC and trying to provide them doesn't do anything. I understand those axes might not normally be used for things where offsets are appropriate but they just as easily could be.
@jay_s_uk Will see how I go. Interestingly I tuned my other Volcano tool just now and it completed in about 13 minutes without the warning (where as that one previously had given me issues as well). I'll see how it all goes once I have them all done and try to get them to temperature.
@dc42 I think you may be right, when I tried it at first it didn’t work however when I switched to U it also didn’t at first but I was trying to define them in their own G10 lines. When I did it all on the same G10 call per tool it seemed to work.
@fcwilt yeah, when I defined the B axis I redefined it as linear per the release notes.
I’ll switch back to B at some point soon and see if it works anyway. Would be good to have the documentation updated if that is the case.
@phaedrux I think it has a fair impact but I haven't quantified it and I do have socks on the hotends so not as much as it would otherwise. Tuning as a heater is what I resorted to originally but circled back as I wanted to try accounting for the fans.
I'm going to try it with the tools in a more realistic position first and see how I go, if that is still giving me dramas I may revert to just tuning as a heater. I haven't seen the heaters fault in any case so the fans can't really have that much impact.
Re-tuned with the tools over the center of the bed. The two Volcano tools both gave me the inconsistent behavior warning this time (where as only one did last time). They gave me:
M307 H3 R1.312 K0.283:0.128 D7.94 E1.35 S1.00 B0 V24.1
M307 H4 R1.396 K0.290:0.166 D7.39 E1.35 S1.00 B0 V24.1
The second part of the K value is still fairly different between the two Volcano tools. At this stage I think I will go with what I have and wait and see if I hit any faults or other issues and come back to this when I have been printing with it more.