Why am I having to run with an extrusion multiplier of 60%?
-
It appears as if Prusa Research has really picked up the Slic3r torch and ran with it! I wasn't aware of all the improvements they've been implementing into Slic3r until now, so if I were you I'd not even bother with building the development release and just try the Prusa fork.
I'm looking forward to trying it out myself.
-
Thanks again. On another thread, Tony pointed out that Joseph Prusa was doing some stuff with active priming towers - I'd love to get my hands on that for use with my Diamond hot end. Unfortunately, this whole 3d printing thing may have to go on back burner for a few weeks after tomorrow.
-
Just a quicky - which file do I download - is it the win64 full zip (I have 64bit windows)?
-
Yep! That would be the one…
Just a quicky - which file do I download - is it the win64 full zip (I have 64bit windows)?
-
Just wanted to put an update in here. I recently wrote a review (http://forums.reprap.org/read.php?1,755161,756827,page=2#msg-756827) on reprap forum of cloned titan extruders. In the process I switched from my genuine (but early release) titan to the Trianglelabs clone. The clone has a hobbed drive gear that is 7.35mm in diameter, my original has a 7.75mm drive gear. However I have had to increase my steps/mm from 333 with the original to 470 with the clone, with a 1.8 deg/200steps motor. Oddly both setups print really well with their respective steps/mm.
I cannot fathom why a 5% change in drive gear diameter has resulted in a 40% increase in steps/mm. Its probably coincidence but the 40% corresponds to Ian's having to run at 60% extrusion multiplier rather too well. The only factor that might be relevant, and I mention it in the review, the teeth on my genuine titan's drive gear are very sharp, whereas the teeth on the clone are much more rounded. Maybe the effect of the sharp teeth was that the original (possibly faulty as there was an issue with titan drive gears on early models) bit into the filament much more reducing their effective diameter, what seems odd is that it was not in the order of 40% smaller effective diameter, that would be very noticeable.
I'm not sure the answer will be very apparent, but if anyone knows, or has had the same issue I'd love to hear about it.
-
I was one of the ones that got a bad one from the first batch and that measure 7.75mm Dim on the hob the replacement had the teeth cut deeper so may well be around the 7.35 mark had loads of grief with the original bad one and even the new one struggled with a long Bowden Tube but is fine in a flying extruder config
Doug
ps I may still be able to get at the pics of them
https://forum.e3d-online.com/index.php?threads/titan-not-extruding-correctly.1214/page-2 post #30
-
So it sounds as though my genuine one had the correct drive gear, and that the clone has a copy of the problematic drive gear. Still doesn't explain the huge change in steps/mm.
-
Possibly got the number of teeth on the 2 gears wrong?
and the bad one is 7.75 co sounds like you got a bad one as well but it is very obvious which is which the one with the wider teeth is the good one -
The one on the left is the clone 7.75mm quite blunt teeth.
The one on the right is the genuine 7.35mm quite sharp teeth.As for the gears between motor and the hobbed shaft they are interchangeable so exactly the same number of teeth I presume.
-
The really bizarre thing in my case was that most of the issues I was having just went away. It coincided with me having to print a new X carriage, fit and new height sensor and while I was at it, fitted the Duex expansion board. None of those things could have caused a significant change in extrusion though but ever since, I've been running with 90% extrusion which is a lot more sensible than the 60% I originally had to use. There must be some sort of dark magic going on…........
