Y Adapter filament switching
-
It's pretty easy to use one of the Duet tool change macros to move to a corner of the bed, dump some filament, then move back again. If you have something like an old toothbrush strategically placed at a fixed position relative to the nozzle in Z, it'll wipe off any ooze as well. Works best with fast non-print moves.
-
I played with that some with my delta, and it's one of the options I wanted to try - putting a "dump bucket" up high between two of the towers, so I could move up to it, switch filaments, purge a bit, and then move back. Has to be up high on a delta so the arms don't hit your print… or needs to follow along in Z as your print gets higher.
-
Ah yes - hadn't considered what you would do with a Delta.
-
I was thinking about just printing an ooze wall, purging some at the edge of the bed after a tool change, then coming back across the wall to wipe the nozzle. I tried bodging some gcode to print a tower but this won't work under all conditions such as layers which have only one colour etc..
Deltas do make it harder, I could devise a dump area but it would have to do some sort of relative move to lift away from the print, move towards the edge, descend to the dump area, then lift back up etc… to avoid collision with the print. It would be satisfying if I can work out the gcode to do it.
-
I think for a delta an absolute position move to a dump bucket near the max Z for a perimeter would be the ideal. it's a LOT of travel, though, and I'm sure you'd want an ooze shield.
Originally I was just purging and using an ooze shield. You get tons of buildup in a hurry, though, and eventually I'd always end up with filament on my part (usually stuck to the nozzle and then it sticks to the part)
-
Prusa must be putting multimaterial code into slic3r they are quite heavily invested in it, and their version is a massive improvement on the original.
-
His original post was that the prime tower was a post processing script, so it could work with any slicer.
-
Haven't got very far with it but one thing that has proved useful I have a filament cleaner above each extruder on my flying extruder bracket, with a bit of foam in each cup, and the foam gets lifted out of the cups on filament changes so I can see what the filament is doing, and which one is loaded by whether the foam is in the cup or 150mm above it. Silly but useful visual reference.
-
@kraegar Im just starting to get into my y splitter. Your scripts from your post from 15 march 17 are the latest right? Or did you optimize the process further
-
I haven't been doing any filament switching since those were updated. They should all work as starting points still, though.
-
Yeah, once I got my filament switching working and I printed a few things, I realized what an ENORMOUS amount of filament I was wasting in the prime tower, I stopped using it, too. Maybe at some point slicers will support using internal infill to purge color, but right now swapping every layer is just too wasteful for me to use.
-
I think multicolour printing is a novelty which with a switching system soon wears off, and takes 3 times the filament and 8 times the time to print (a mixing hot end seems to perform this function better). I can see the point of printing with soluble support material, but also think a second x carriage with independent z probe is probably the best way to achieve it.
-
The problem with multiple hotends is the XYZ calibration. It is not funny, and you have to do it again as soon a you swap nozzle or so.
Z can be automatically calibrated using piezo or similar probing system, but how to calibrate XY?
-
I think multicolour printing is a novelty which with a switching system soon wears off, and takes 3 times the filament and 8 times the time to print (a mixing hot end seems to perform this function better). I can see the point of printing with soluble support material, but also think a second x carriage with independent z probe is probably the best way to achieve it.
With a "mixing" hot end it is possible to print multi coloured objects with zero waste and zero impact on print time but with a few caveats. For one thing, as all the filaments are loaded at all times, the amount of purge required is basically what is in the mixing chamber. Depending on the object being printed, this purge can happen during infill where it isn't noticeable. Where it would be noticeable, then a separate purge mechanism is needed but due to the very small amount of purge needed (compared to fully retracting one filament and feeding in another), it can be a very small tower or simple bucket. The main advantages over multiple nozzles is that you don't loose axis travel by having to allow for nozzle offsets, you do not have to worry about Z alignment, there is no waiting time for one tool heat while another cools and you do not have to worry about fighting ooze from nozzles which aren't currently in use. Haven't said all that, mixing hot ends are not without their own particular set of unique problems. They are not for the faint hearted or those without deepish pockets (I'm thinking about my 5 E3D Titan extruders when I say that). Oh and of course, a true mixing hot end (one which actually blends colours together) is yet to be invented.
-
With a Y switching system, is the purge length shorter with a Lite6 rather than a E3dv6?
-
I think multicolour printing is a novelty which with a switching system soon wears off, and takes 3 times the filament and 8 times the time to print (a mixing hot end seems to perform this function better). I can see the point of printing with soluble support material, but also think a second x carriage with independent z probe is probably the best way to achieve it.
This sums up my experience. I got it working well, got some great looking multicolor prints. Got tired of the headaches from it, and moved back to printing single color prints. The time & headache weren't worth it once the novelty wore off.
-
I will add that the Mosaic Pallette+ system looks like a really nice setup if you just want multi-color prints. The results I've seen from it so far look impressive… with apparently a lot less headache. Very expensive, though.
-
I'm wondering how reliable this system is… Looks pretty complex.
-
@fma:
With a Y switching system, is the purge length shorter with a Lite6 rather than a E3dv6?
Most of my switching was done with a Lite 6. With some color combinations (usually darker colors), the color change was pretty quick. But when I was changing from red to white, it would never print white. It was always pink. I think the largest purge tower I used was 20x20, and it was still printing pink afterwards. That's when I decided filament switching wasn't worth the pain/cost…
-
@fma:
With a Y switching system, is the purge length shorter with a Lite6 rather than a E3dv6?
Most of my switching was done with a Lite 6. With some color combinations (usually darker colors), the color change was pretty quick. But when I was changing from red to white, it would never print white. It was always pink. I think the largest purge tower I used was 20x20, and it was still printing pink afterwards. That's when I decided filament switching wasn't worth the pain/cost…
Red to white was always the worst for me, too. I think it took a 30x30 to get it to switch.
That's the transition that got me to thinking about using a purge bucket, and some sort of color sensor….
