Giant Delta printer Slow Homing issue.
-
@dc42
These are the present settings working smoothly after home.; Drives M569 P5 S0 R0 T3:3:5:0 ; Extruder drive 0 goes Forward M569 P2 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6 ; X:A drive 1 goes Forward M569 P3 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6 ; Y:B drive 2 goes Forward M569 P4 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6 ; Z:C physical drive 3 goes Forward M584 X6 Y7 Z8 E5 ; set drive mapping M350 X0 Y0 Z0 E0 I0 ; configure microstepping without interpolation M92 X114.29 Y114.29 Z114.29 E274.00 ; set steps per mm (400/140) * 40 = 114.2857 ;; 400 step per rev ;; 140 mm one rev pulley ;;1:40 ratio gearbox
I have tested individual axis as well both with these settings and another (Correct) one as well.
However, I will do another youtube video to show you how it behaves.Steps / mm value is no different than earlier. Because I have added a locked 1:40 gearbox to keep axis from freefall.
Switch settings on driver 400 pulse/revolution.
-
@sozkan
Hello,
I have made a video on youtube to compare drive mapping the working accidental settings and recommended settings P values.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJFbPPyj9F0By the way, I keep the Extruder value( P5) as recommended. However, the extruder doesn't sound like cracking, but not calibrated moves in both settings. Since I don't know if the manufacturer (Dyze) gives the right settings, I don`t worry about the extruder now.
-
Here the individual axis trial video on Youtube,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fNw1B7A73g
Accidental or Illegal parameters on P values trial:
; Drives M569 P5 S0 R0 T3:3:5:0; Extruder drive 0 goes Forward M569 P1 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; X: A drive 1 goes Forward M569 P2 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; Y: B drive 2 goes Forward M569 P3 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; Z: C physical drive 3 goes Forward M584 X6 Y7 Z8 E5 M350 X0 Y0 Z0 E0 I0; configure microstepping without interpolation
As Summary:
These setting working smooth, but before home, G1 command working smoothly on all axis like;G91 ; relative positioning G1 H2 X-100 Y-100 Z-100 F1000; go down a few mm
But when individual command sent, It does not work correctly, like these command;
G91; relative positioning G1 H2 X-100 F1000; go down a few mm
Recommended Parameters on P values trial :
; Drives M569 P5 S0 R0 T3:3:5:0 ; Extruder drive 0 goes Forward M569 P6 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6 ; X:A drive 1 goes Forward M569 P7 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6 ; Y:B drive 2 goes Forward M569 P8 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6 ; Z:C physical drive 3 goes Forward M584 X6 Y7 Z8 E5 M350 X0 Y0 Z0 E0 I0; configure microstepping without interpolation
All the move commands work the same with the only problem, the horrible sound(sign for incorrect steps), and incorrect calibration distance. It is basically running a shorter distance than the previous parameter.
-
can you also post a picture of the switch settings on the drivers please
-
and using 0 in M350 is invalid.
A value of at least 1 should be used for all axis. e.g.M350 X1 Y1 Z1 E1 I0
https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Gcode#Section_M350_Set_microstepping_mode
-
@jay_s_uk said in Giant Delta printer Slow Homing issue.:
can you also post a picture of the switch settings on the drivers please
Default means 400 steps/Rev
-
@jay_s_uk said in Giant Delta printer Slow Homing issue.:
M350 X1 Y1 Z1 E1 I0
It did not make difference. incorrect steps remain in this mode. -
you've got the drivers set to 400 steps per mm, and i believe originally, you were looking at using 3200 steps per mm.
have you tried switching back to that?
That should reduce the amount of noise you are hearing -
@jay_s_uk said in Giant Delta printer Slow Homing issue.:
you've got the drivers set to 400 steps per mm, and i believe originally, you were looking at using 3200 steps per mm.
have you tried switching back to that?
That should reduce the amount of noise you are hearingIt was actually the previous setup. The sound and problem with the same setting remained at 3200 settings.
The reason 400 setting is on, I have added a 1:40 Gearbox. Therefore, 400 was an appropriate setting.
The new setup;
M92 X114.29 Y114.29 Z114.29 E274.00 ; set steps per mm (400/140) * 40 = 114.2857 ; 400 step per rev ;; 140 mm one rev pulley ;1:40 ratio gearbox
However, It could be higher steps/mm with smoother settings variation, I would try. But Due to the high gearbox, it needs high-speed rotation to need on the motor. So, the lower step is lesser the signal density.
But the actual issue is not noise. Hearing noise is just a sign.
The actual issue is within the recommended P values noise into the signal output of the breakout board. I can connect an oscilloscope to prove it. Some missing steps cause less travel than the actual distance. -
The Motor Control Problem resolved! ( interns of calibration and successful machine move ) ( But I still need your valuable help on bed calibration Should I open a new thread?)
Thank you very much for all your contribution.
Solution: I have just upgraded to the latest beta Firmware and DWC.
Conclusion:
But the configuration remains as (P 2-3-4) I was using. The recommended P 5-6-7-8 values causing problems. If it is not an issue with "Duet 2 Wifi r.104" It is something with the firmware I believe.The Problem with recommended configuration P-values causing missing steps and noisy move. Each axis even the same amount moves command, they move different distances.
By the accidentally found settings and new Firmware update problem is over!
So this is the code that is working so far:
; Drives M569 P5 S0 R0 T3:3:5:0; Extruder drive 0 goes Forward M569 P2 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; X: A drive 1 goes Forward M569 P3 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; Y: B drive 2 goes Forward M569 P4 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; Z: C physical drive 3 goes Forward M584 X6 Y7 Z8 E5; set drive mapping M350 X1 Y1 Z1 E1 I1; configure microstepping without interpolation M92 X114.29 Y114.29 Z114.29 E274.00 ; set steps per mm (400/140) * 40 = 114.2857 ;; 400 step per rev ;; 140 mm one rev pulley ;;1:40 ratio gearbox
-
-