Error: bad Command XXX W/RRF 3.2 and leveling issue
-
I am not quite sure, but in manual, I do tool change and on 10.5 Z my gauge is spot on. I tested the right extruder month ago, but with changing the system ofset. When negative it is not right. Looking at e3d tool changer it is negative, you might be right
-
@3DPrintingWorld The V6 is shorter, otherwise, I would make them equal in Z. I hate that thing with tools and the Z shown on the screen since old Fanuc millnig CNC controls. Exactly why for tooling work I do not use length compensation and just switch the WCS (G54 , G55 etc) for each tool
-
@martin7404 Yeah, I think you would have a hard time trying to find 2.5mm to remove from the height. When I switched from the nimble to the BMG I really fought to keep the extruder as low to the bearing as I could.
-
@3DPrintingWorld The problem for me is that there is no info how duet handles tool offsets I made it successfully on Dual lifting hotends but it was on PRF 2.5 and the moving extruder was longer
-
@martin7404 According to this you change the offset of T1. This tells me that the number can be positive or negative because otherwise you would have to modify T0 offset if the number was negative.
-
@3DPrintingWorld link ?
-
-
@3DPrintingWorld thank you
I still do not see what I am doing wrong -
@martin7404 so making it a negative number didn't help?
-
@3DPrintingWorld I am remote to the printer
IT is in the shop and I am at home and I am afraid to test it on the camera -
@martin7404 To be safe you could change it to a negative on the T1 offset then add 2.55mm to your T0 probe offset.
-
@3DPrintingWorld I am printing it now with 5 mm offset from the slicer
-
@martin7404 Got it! You are doing it differently but I just wanted to clear up what I said, to add to the probe height you would actually have to subtract.
-
YES and I canceled it , because slicer offset do not affect the priming
-
IT is working, showing 0.3 on the DWS screen. IT is in the air , but I can not tell from the camera
-
I did check one of my backups of the settings a month ago the offset for tool 1 was - and then testing it in manual with panel due I did switch it in some moment
-
@martin7404 That explains it!
Last night I erased the firmware a reloaded 3.1.1 and I still have all the same issues..... I must be missing something somewhere. -
V3.22 now it shows correct height but prints in the air.
Now testing with positive offset.
Installed 2nd camera as far I have to go home
One more thing on simulation it shows normal heights with positive offset and with printing shows layer+offset -
So made a few tests firmware 3.22
- Z offset -2.55 , the DWS shows exact layer height , but the head is about 5 mm up
- Z offset 2.55 and the head is about 5 mm up, and DWC shows layer height + offset
- Ofset iin config is 0 , Shows corect in DWC and the head is 2.55+layer up
Tested like that start printing and mid first layer EMERGENCY and measured with steel gauges.
I start to thing that this is a bug related to the fact it is IDEX definition in TOOLS section of config.g
-
Rollback to 3.11 and PANEL DUE to 1.24
Same story
With an offset of -2.55 on tool1 it is showing correct layer height and is about 5 mm up
Tried to disable the tool2 (copy mode in case this is messing), no efect I am starting to think, that because with + offset, shorter hotend than no tool, the duet has some failsafe no to hit the gantry. I will try to add 2.55 to probe and -2.55 to T0 ( loading TO with the config, of course )
